The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1601 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Good morning, and welcome to the third meeting in 2025 of the SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee. I have received no apologies for today’s meeting.
Under agenda item 1, the committee will take evidence from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman, and I am very pleased to welcome Rosemary Agnew to the meeting.
We move directly to questions, and I will ask a general question first. What do you consider to be the SPSO’s role, and how does it differ from the role of ministers, MSPs and other public bodies?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Before I go to Lorna Slater, I have a question on the same topic. My other committee—the Criminal Justice Committee—is considering the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill, which includes a proposal to establish a victims and witnesses commissioner for Scotland. There has been discourse in Parliament and beyond about such a role. If you were inclined to speak in similarly candid terms, given your experience and understanding, is that an area that you as an ombudsman could encompass as well?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is very helpful. Colleagues, are there any further questions that you would like to ask?
Members indicated disagreement.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you very much. Those were very helpful questions and responses.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you; that is helpful for our inquiry.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Good morning, all. Noting, and not disputing, what has just been said by our witnesses, I recall what the committee has been told in recent weeks about the practicalities of implementation. Dr Scott, I am curious to hear your position on whether, given what you propose in your written evidence, which you have elaborated on in your oral evidence this morning, additional time would be required before implementation for the courts and any other facilities to be properly and fully equipped so that virtual evidence could be taken in every appropriate case. Is that something that you would deem to be acceptable?
We have heard some interesting evidence in recent weeks to the effect that the commencement of the bill as drafted would be appropriate, but that there would be quite a time period thereafter before anything happened, despite the fact that the pilot has resulted in the provision of facilities in some places. It seems that, if more use is to be made of virtual evidence, we need to significantly add to the provision that there is just now.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you for that. The next questions come from Richard Leonard.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the second meeting in 2025 of the SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee. I have received no apologies for the meeting.
Today, we will take evidence from Ian Bruce, who is the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland, and then from Suzanne Vestri, who is convener of the Standards Commission for Scotland. Thank you for being here and for your written evidence.
I welcome Ian Bruce. We move directly to questions, and I will start with quite a general one. How do you perceive the current role of Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body-supported bodies in enhancing public trust and confidence in public life in Scotland?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Would you like to say anything else?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you. Of course, that is, in your case, particularly relevant with regard to local councillors. What do you consider the purpose of an SPCB-supported commissioner to be, particularly in your case? How does it differ from that of ministers, MSPs and other public bodies? What is the importance of your independence in all of that?