The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1264 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Ben Macpherson
That was really interesting. We move from budget setting and scrutiny to questions about criteria and decision making for creating officers of Parliament. To probe those issues a little, I pass to our colleague Murdo Fraser, who joins us remotely.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Ben Macpherson
Good morning, and welcome to the ninth meeting in 2025 of the SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee.
Ash Regan MSP has sent her apologies for the start of this meeting and hopes to join us later. I have received no other apologies. I am joined in the room by Richard Leonard MSP and Lorna Slater MSP. Our colleague Murdo Fraser MSP joins us remotely.
Today, the committee will take evidence on the New Zealand officers of Parliament. We are pleased to welcome Dr David Wilson, clerk of the House of Representatives of the New Zealand Parliament. Thank you for your time and for being with us this morning, Dr Wilson. We are looking forward to hearing your insights. Thank you for taking our questions and joining us for our evidence taking.
We will move directly to questions. My first question is quite generic. At the start of each previous evidence session, we have asked those in front of us what they think the purpose of an SPCB-supported body is. In the same way, for completeness, I would be grateful if you could outline what the purpose of a New Zealand officer of Parliament is and what you think their purpose is.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Ben Macpherson
That was really helpful additional information, Dr Wilson. I see that colleagues in the room have no further questions.
Thank you again for your time and insights. We are grateful to have heard from you this morning—it is morning where we are and it is evening where you are. You mentioned at one point that you might follow up with a bit more detail—if you could, we would be grateful for it.
That concludes the public part of our meeting.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Ben Macpherson
Please do.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is fascinating. Thank you for sharing all that. I will hand over to my colleagues to pick up those points.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Ben Macpherson
How does an officer of Parliament work along with the rest of the legislature to scrutinise and hold the Executive to account?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Ben Macpherson
Yes, please.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Ben Macpherson
It is interesting that, because of the criteria and processes that have been in place since 1989, New Zealand’s Parliament has kept the officers of Parliament very tight and structured, whereas, looking at the list of Crown entities, I see that they seem to have developed in a less streamlined and systematic way.
I want to go back to one of your earlier answers. It would be good to get a little more clarity on the process that is involved when there is a proposal for a new officer of Parliament. Would a proposal go to the Officers of Parliament Committee before it was legislated for, and would it be considered again by the committee once legislation was introduced? During any scrutiny processes, would subject committees refer to the criteria as well? You spoke earlier about how some proposed officers of Parliament have been considered by the Environment Committee, for example. Would subject committees apply the criteria in the same way?
08:45SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you. That is a really helpful clarification. I hand back to Lorna Slater to ask questions on support and resources for officers of Parliament.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is helpful. Finally, is there anything that you want to express or emphasise to us that you think might be helpful and that you have not had a chance to mention in relation to how things operate in New Zealand?