The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1264 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you. Of course, that is, in your case, particularly relevant with regard to local councillors. What do you consider the purpose of an SPCB-supported commissioner to be, particularly in your case? How does it differ from that of ministers, MSPs and other public bodies? What is the importance of your independence in all of that?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
In recent years, we have seen changes to the “Code of Conduct for Councillors”. I am sure that the always-changing environment of public life has given rise to some considerations for you and your colleagues as to how, as the Standards Commission, you promote awareness of and compliance with the ethical standards expected of those in public life. What challenges have you faced in that regard?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
We appreciate that undertaking. As well as following up in writing with Mr Fraser, perhaps you could copy your response to the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee. I know from my experience as Minister for Social Security and Local Government and taking through an update to the code—
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Lorna Slater has a supplementary question, and then she can just go into her own questions.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thanks. Are you finished?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Lorna Slater has a supplementary question.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you. I thought that it was important to mention that you work across Parliament and the Government in your interactions.
Do you want to say anything that you have not had a chance to say in answer to our questions?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
We will come to the other commissioners in due course. In order to build on that helpful introduction, can you say more about what you consider to be the purpose of an SPCB-supported commissioner? In particular, how does the role differ from those of ministers, MSPs and other bodies? In your response to the call for views, you emphasised the importance of independence for SPCB-supported bodies, but in your view, and in your experience, how does that independence enhance public confidence in the ethical conduct of MSPs, councillors and public body board members?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
We move to questions from Ash Regan.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
If colleagues have nothing further that they want to ask, I have one final question.
You talked earlier about the strategic plan, which, as we all know, is set in legislation to run for a period of four years. Is that an adequate timeframe? Would a longer or shorter timeframe have a positive or negative impact? Do you have any feedback on the strategic plan timeframe?