The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1264 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That provides really helpful context. Thank you very much. That leads us nicely to questions from my colleague Murdo Fraser.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is very helpful. Audit Scotland will give evidence to us and you have given us information that we might want to raise.
Richard Leonard wants to come back in.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you. If you want to follow up in writing with any further thoughts on that, that would be very helpful. I now turn to Ash Regan.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
I will bring Richard Leonard back in, in a second. You mentioned that currently all office-holders are individually audited and that there could be a saving if there was an opportunity for doing one audit for all office-holders. What challenges or opportunities in doing that do you want to highlight to us today, or as a follow-up, if that is more appropriate?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
We will consider that further. Thank you very much.
Richard Leonard raised a point about other ombudsman functions—both reserved and devolved. This is just a question of curiosity more than anything else, but are there cyclical moments throughout the calendar year at which you sit around a table together or have a call that the Government convenes? There must be so much opportunity for shared insight and learning. It is a cluttered landscape, which is partly why the committee has been charged with this SPCB work. I am interested to hear how you collaborate and communicate on a wide scale.
10:45SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you very much, Rosemary, for your time today and for sharing your insights and answering our questions.
The next meeting will be after recess, colleagues, when the committee will hear from the Scottish Information Commissioner and the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner. We will conclude the public part of our meeting. As was previously agreed by the committee, we move into private session to consider today’s evidence.
10:50 Meeting continued in private until 11:09.SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Do you want to ask your question about the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland at this point, Richard?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you; that is helpful for our inquiry.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Good morning, all. Noting, and not disputing, what has just been said by our witnesses, I recall what the committee has been told in recent weeks about the practicalities of implementation. Dr Scott, I am curious to hear your position on whether, given what you propose in your written evidence, which you have elaborated on in your oral evidence this morning, additional time would be required before implementation for the courts and any other facilities to be properly and fully equipped so that virtual evidence could be taken in every appropriate case. Is that something that you would deem to be acceptable?
We have heard some interesting evidence in recent weeks to the effect that the commencement of the bill as drafted would be appropriate, but that there would be quite a time period thereafter before anything happened, despite the fact that the pilot has resulted in the provision of facilities in some places. It seems that, if more use is to be made of virtual evidence, we need to significantly add to the provision that there is just now.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2025
Ben Macpherson
I am sorry to interrupt you, but Mr Fraser will touch on some of that in a moment. Specifically on the issue of international examples, which Lorna Slater asked you about, is there anything that you want to add from your engagement with peers in different jurisdictions and countries?