The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1264 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you for that, and thank you particularly for emphasising the point in paragraph 3(2) of the schedule about the restriction applying to the period of the year prior to the appointment. That is a key point for us to consider.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Good morning, and welcome to the third meeting in 2025 of the SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee. I have received no apologies for today’s meeting.
Under agenda item 1, the committee will take evidence from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman, and I am very pleased to welcome Rosemary Agnew to the meeting.
We move directly to questions, and I will ask a general question first. What do you consider to be the SPSO’s role, and how does it differ from the role of ministers, MSPs and other public bodies?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Before I go to Lorna Slater, I have a question on the same topic. My other committee—the Criminal Justice Committee—is considering the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill, which includes a proposal to establish a victims and witnesses commissioner for Scotland. There has been discourse in Parliament and beyond about such a role. If you were inclined to speak in similarly candid terms, given your experience and understanding, is that an area that you as an ombudsman could encompass as well?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is very helpful. Colleagues, are there any further questions that you would like to ask?
Members indicated disagreement.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Thank you very much. Those were very helpful questions and responses.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That was very helpful and succinct. Of course, those of us around the table in the Parliament are aware of what you have said, but it is helpful to get that on the record for our inquiry and our work.
The origins of your organisation are interesting. We can look back to the beginning of devolution, when there was a local government ombudsman, a health service ombudsman and a housing association ombudsman. In time, those roles came together. How does your organisation find operating across different policy areas? In local government, you look at the welfare fund and other issues, and you have functions relating to whistleblowing in the NHS. It would be interesting to hear any comments about public trust in that regard.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
I will build on some of that before I bring in Ash Regan. You said earlier that it would be helpful to be able to share information between ombudsmen and commissioners. You may have said everything that you want to say in response to Richard Leonard, but is there anything more that you want to add on barriers to sharing services?
I know that Richard Leonard touched on the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland, and I am interested in the Scottish Human Rights Commission, too. I would be interested to know how you work with those bodies. For example, last week they published a bit of work on independent living, which, of course, is related to local government. I wondered how you collaborate, given that there is some overlap there, although obviously you deal with complaints and they are more proactive and investigatory. I am interested in any thoughts that you may have on that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is very helpful. I appreciate that you handle final-stage complaints about the Scottish Human Rights Commission, for example. How do you go about dealing with complaints about other SPCB supported bodies?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
That is helpful.
You talked earlier about how many of the organisations are based in Bridgeside house in my constituency, and how that creates almost organic dialogue and sharing of insights. What about bodies like the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner and the Care Inspectorate? Are you ever in dialogue with them?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ben Macpherson
Ombudsman, is there anything that you would like to say that you have not had a chance to say in answer to any of our questions?