The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 380 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Ash Regan
Good morning. The committee is interested in the ideas of accountability and scrutiny, and whether you think that those are robust. The Scottish Human Rights Commission was set up by the Parliament to uphold human rights and to ensure that policy meets human rights requirements.
Last week, the EHRC intervened in the wake of the case involving Sandie Peggie and NHS Fife, but I note that we have not heard from you on that case or on single-sex spaces, nor have we heard from you on toilets in schools, the British Transport Police’s intimate search policy or Police Scotland’s policies on sex and gender. I argue that women’s human rights are very much affected by those issues. How, therefore, are you accountable to the Parliament and to the people of Scotland if you are failing to uphold the standards that provide the very reason for your existence?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Ash Regan
With regard to upholding women’s rights across Scotland, do you agree with John Swinney that trans women are women—in relation to the points of policy that I have raised—or do you agree with Reem Alsalem that, when it comes to single-sex spaces, sex means sex?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Ash Regan
But CEDAW is within your remit—
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Ash Regan
I want to turn to accountability and scrutiny mechanisms. We are interested to know whether the scrutiny that you are receiving is robust and whether you feel that it is appropriate. Could you give us your view on how you are scrutinised, and whether you think that there are more effective ways in which that could be done?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Ash Regan
I, too, want to ask about the mechanisms around the accountability and scrutiny functions. In your written submission, you suggest—as you have done in your exchange with Richard Leonard—that your mechanisms are appropriate and robust. Annual reports feature as a main part of that scrutiny, certainly for the committees in the Parliament, and you suggest that there are ways in which that mechanism could be made more effective. Could you explain that?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Ash Regan
I will summarise what you have said. There should be increased frequency of your appearances in front of the corporate body and, possibly, in front of committees, although we all understand that there are capacity issues in relation to the Criminal Justice Committee, which is why, in the previous parliamentary session, there was the Justice Sub-committee on Policing, which provided extra capacity.
I want to pick up your point about the reports that you produce. Do you feel that you are not receiving any sort of scrutiny on a number of your reports?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Ash Regan
Different forms of accountability and scrutiny are interacting. We have the corporate body, the SPPA Committee and Audit Scotland. How do you think they are working together? Is there anything that could be done to improve that?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Ash Regan
Your organisation publishes a lot of data sets on performance, including key performance indicators against the functions that are set out in the enabling legislation. Not all the supported bodies are required to do that. Should all the supported bodies publish the same sets of information?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ash Regan
Good morning. I want to cover issues around accountability and scrutiny mechanisms. In your submission to the committee, you set out the various different interactions between those scrutiny mechanisms. Can you explain those a little bit for us and say how they work together and whether they are effective and robust?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Ash Regan
You mentioned the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee. It held additional scrutiny sessions, as I understand it, involving academics and additional organisations. Did that approach improve the scrutiny? What else could we be doing to improve the level of scrutiny and accountability?