The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 978 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Daniel Johnson
I have a couple of questions that follow on from some of those answers. You have alluded to the work that you have been doing alongside the National Wealth Fund and the British Business Bank, mainly to do with the Treasury rules. That raises another question of how you work operationally with them. Ultimately, we want public money to work in concert rather than pull in different directions. Will you outline your approach to working with other bodies such as those?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Daniel Johnson
Good morning and welcome to the 26th meeting in 2025 of the Economy and Fair Work Committee. Today, the committee will continue its pre-budget scrutiny and will hear evidence from the Scottish National Investment Bank.
Before we proceed, I note that we have apologies from Willie Coffey, Lorna Slater and Michelle Thomson, the deputy convener. However, although the committee is smaller in number, I am sure that we will have just as many questions.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2 in their packs. Members have agreed to take agenda items 2 and 3 in private, which may also afford us the opportunity to discuss recent urgent questions and responses from the minister regarding the transient visitor levy.
Agenda item 1 is our pre-budget scrutiny with the Scottish National Investment Bank. We are joined by Willie Watt, who is the chair, and Michael Robertson, who is the chief financial officer.
I will begin by asking questions about financial sustainability. In the most recent year for which we have reports, there was an operating income of £34.5 million, with operating costs of just over £16 million, and there were significant write-offs. I want to understand what the bank’s plan is to meet financial sustainability so that, rather than simply operating in profit, you are making a net profit, which, ultimately, is surely the aim of the bank.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Daniel Johnson
Critically, at what point is the bank planning to be self-sustaining? I understand what you have said, and we are all familiar with the commitment of £2 billion over 10 years. However, circumstances change and Government priorities change. Although that commitment is there and is broadly supported across the parties, if that funding were to stop today you would have a problem. At what point will the bank cease to have a problem?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Daniel Johnson
I think that we will get into that with subsequent questions.
My first question is about whether the plan is to get to a point where the bank stands on its own two feet, or whether it will require on-going capital injections or financial interventions from Government to carry on operating. What is the forward plan, and what does sustainability look like for the Scottish National Investment Bank?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Daniel Johnson
I understand that you do not necessarily have complete foresight in terms of what will happen with your portfolio, and that there are a number of other things that you need to have in place. I get all that. However, I am still not entirely clear on what the plan is. If all those things happen, when will the bank be self-sustaining? Do you have that plan? Do you have a target date?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Daniel Johnson
Therefore, the short answer is that we need to devolution-proof the approach for the PuFin framework.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Daniel Johnson
With that, I will draw our questions to a close. I thank both witnesses for attending the meeting and for providing such full answers.
10:56 Meeting continued in private until 11:26.Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Daniel Johnson
A final question has occurred to me while you were providing your answers, which have been varied and broad. Indeed, we have managed to cover everything from investment strategy and housing to Israel and Gaza.
What strikes me is that you, Mr Watt, are very close to operational decisions. That might be a necessity, given the number of chief executives that you have had, but, ultimately, one would want a division between the chair and the chief executive and for the chair to have a broader view of strategy and be less proximate to the operation. Is there a risk that your role is too close to the bank’s operational and management decisions? That approach might have been necessitated, because of the change of chief executives, but it strikes me that that is a question that needs to be asked in the interest of corporate governance.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Daniel Johnson
Surely, if you can keep it brief.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Daniel Johnson
You do not sound entirely sure.