The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 783 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
How will we know if these deals have succeeded? Are there clear goals and measures, first at interim points, so that we can see whether they are on track, and secondly, when we look back? Will we be able to tell which ones have delivered, or do we not have clarity on the goals?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
Thank you very much.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
I will focus my questions on the overall function and purpose of the growth deals, and whether those elements are clear. In a sense, this follows on from the point that was unearthed regarding the cluttered landscape.
Do you feel that there is clarity around what each of the growth deals seeks to achieve? Are those aspects well defined and compatible with one another, and are they always compatible with national policy and objectives? Perhaps colleagues from Audit Scotland can begin.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
I want to circle back to how the level was arrived at and the evidence. I very much appreciate the insight about the lack of data, but I have always been taught to be suspicious of round numbers. Although £1,000 is a nice round number, £750 seems like a very nice round number. I appreciate that there is a lack of data, but what methodology was used to arrive at £750 or was that just a judgment? The flipside of the question is: what would have been the consequence or potential cost of going with £1,000 rather than £750?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
Are you confident that the projects within deals are compatible with one another? Sometimes one looks at these deals and everything looks great, but what end are the projects all driving at, and are they all consistent, even within growth deals? Are you confident that that is the case?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
I see that Neil McInroy is nodding away, or at least gesticulating. Neil, what are your thoughts on those points?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
I will ask one last question, which is a fundamental one, and I will leave my questions there. If growth deals did not exist, would you reinvent them? Are we creating something because we do not have a regional tier of government, whether that is old-school regions or combined authorities, as we have in other parts of the UK?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
I see that Catherine Young wants to come in. I will add one more point first.
Is Audit Scotland aware of whether the UK Government or the Scottish Government are looking at this area? Given that it involves Government money, I am interested in whether they, as well as Audit Scotland, are looking at that. What are your thoughts on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
I will push you a little bit on that. All of us round this table are familiar with how advocacy works; indeed, we undertake it day in and day out. I would find it quite difficult to do that job if I did not hold surgeries with my constituents to understand what they needed. In a functional sense, how can you understand what to advocate for on consumers’ behalf if you are not doing that sort of thing directly? In conducting broad research, as it were, is there a danger that everyone ends up as a statistic rather than a person, and that you miss some of the more fundamental issues that you would have picked up if you had that direct contact?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Daniel Johnson
I understand. There are lots of different ways in which one can understand the consumer experience.
That brings me to my final question. Part of my reason for asking this is that I completely recognise that Citizens Advice Scotland does a great job, but its funding is under severe pressure. Because of those funding pressures, it is not the organisation that it might once have been or might hope to be.
Just reflecting on my constituency casework, I note that I am getting an increasing number of people approaching me because they are struggling to get good consumer advice to understand what their contractual obligations are with providers of goods or services, when procuring things or buying products directly from shops or online and, in particular, with the building trade. My view is that the availability of direct consumer advice is much weaker than it was perhaps a decade or two ago. What is your view of that and of your role in helping to rebuild the advice ecosystem or landscape?
10:15