Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 18 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 783 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 27 November 2024

Daniel Johnson

How will we know if these deals have succeeded? Are there clear goals and measures, first at interim points, so that we can see whether they are on track, and secondly, when we look back? Will we be able to tell which ones have delivered, or do we not have clarity on the goals?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 27 November 2024

Daniel Johnson

Thank you very much.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 27 November 2024

Daniel Johnson

I will focus my questions on the overall function and purpose of the growth deals, and whether those elements are clear. In a sense, this follows on from the point that was unearthed regarding the cluttered landscape.

Do you feel that there is clarity around what each of the growth deals seeks to achieve? Are those aspects well defined and compatible with one another, and are they always compatible with national policy and objectives? Perhaps colleagues from Audit Scotland can begin.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 27 November 2024

Daniel Johnson

I want to circle back to how the level was arrived at and the evidence. I very much appreciate the insight about the lack of data, but I have always been taught to be suspicious of round numbers. Although £1,000 is a nice round number, £750 seems like a very nice round number. I appreciate that there is a lack of data, but what methodology was used to arrive at £750 or was that just a judgment? The flipside of the question is: what would have been the consequence or potential cost of going with £1,000 rather than £750?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 27 November 2024

Daniel Johnson

Are you confident that the projects within deals are compatible with one another? Sometimes one looks at these deals and everything looks great, but what end are the projects all driving at, and are they all consistent, even within growth deals? Are you confident that that is the case?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 27 November 2024

Daniel Johnson

I see that Neil McInroy is nodding away, or at least gesticulating. Neil, what are your thoughts on those points?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 27 November 2024

Daniel Johnson

I will ask one last question, which is a fundamental one, and I will leave my questions there. If growth deals did not exist, would you reinvent them? Are we creating something because we do not have a regional tier of government, whether that is old-school regions or combined authorities, as we have in other parts of the UK?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

City Region and Regional Growth Deals

Meeting date: 27 November 2024

Daniel Johnson

I see that Catherine Young wants to come in. I will add one more point first.

Is Audit Scotland aware of whether the UK Government or the Scottish Government are looking at this area? Given that it involves Government money, I am interested in whether they, as well as Audit Scotland, are looking at that. What are your thoughts on that?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Consumer Scotland

Meeting date: 13 November 2024

Daniel Johnson

I will push you a little bit on that. All of us round this table are familiar with how advocacy works; indeed, we undertake it day in and day out. I would find it quite difficult to do that job if I did not hold surgeries with my constituents to understand what they needed. In a functional sense, how can you understand what to advocate for on consumers’ behalf if you are not doing that sort of thing directly? In conducting broad research, as it were, is there a danger that everyone ends up as a statistic rather than a person, and that you miss some of the more fundamental issues that you would have picked up if you had that direct contact?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Consumer Scotland

Meeting date: 13 November 2024

Daniel Johnson

I understand. There are lots of different ways in which one can understand the consumer experience.

That brings me to my final question. Part of my reason for asking this is that I completely recognise that Citizens Advice Scotland does a great job, but its funding is under severe pressure. Because of those funding pressures, it is not the organisation that it might once have been or might hope to be.

Just reflecting on my constituency casework, I note that I am getting an increasing number of people approaching me because they are struggling to get good consumer advice to understand what their contractual obligations are with providers of goods or services, when procuring things or buying products directly from shops or online and, in particular, with the building trade. My view is that the availability of direct consumer advice is much weaker than it was perhaps a decade or two ago. What is your view of that and of your role in helping to rebuild the advice ecosystem or landscape?

10:15