The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 895 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning, and thanks for the evidence so far.
The bulletin highlights that failure to invest in infrastructure increases the risk that asset failures may impact services. In your experience so far, have you found any evidence that that is happening at the moment? If so, what services have you found to be most at risk?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I will come to housing in a wee bit, but I have a question to ask in the chamber tomorrow about capital investment in schools. In North Lanarkshire Council, in my constituency, there are a lot of new school builds, about which I am delighted, but there are pockets where there are no plans in place to renew schools that are very outdated. One of those areas in my constituency is Moodiesburn, which is a particularly impoverished area.
Are capital investment issues more likely to affect particular communities and demographic areas?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Moving on, the committee was quite surprised to hear that two councils do not have multiyear plans in place. I should say that I do not represent an area that covers either South Lanarkshire Council or Stirling Council—I do not know whether any other members with more local links will want to come in on this. Do you know the reasons for that situation? What should change to encourage or enable all councils to have such plans in place?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
It is really helpful to get that on the record and to clarify that for both those cases.
The committee has been quite surprised that some councils have underspent in their housing projects, despite many of them announcing housing emergencies last year, as you will be well aware. Are you able to explain the reasons for that? Did you manage to get into them?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I probably phrased the question wrong, because I went on a wee preamble before it. I was asking, rather, whether you think that councils should prioritise certain areas, although I can understand that that is not your remit. Rather than your recommendations to councils, I was trying to get at whether you think that certain communities and demographics are more likely to be impacted when there is a failure to invest in infrastructure services. Is that something that you would see?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
I appreciate that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 February 2025
Fulton MacGregor
It is useful to hear you say that there are issues and demands other than councils’ commitment to getting houses built. Do you have a list of the councils that have housing underspends? It is fine if you do not; perhaps you could provide the committee with that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Good morning. The committee has had a really good discussion on virtual attendance—we have got a lot out of that.
I want to move on to the fiscal fines provision in the bill. My questions are probably for the three legal representatives, but the police representatives are free to come in. You will know that the bill proposes to make permanent the temporary provisions on a higher maximum level of fiscal fine—£500 as opposed to £300. How is the higher level of fines being used at the moment? What would happen if the current temporary measures were not made permanent? Do you have any concerns about that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
That has been helpful. You have been quite clear in your view on the temporary provisions being made permanent.
In relation to fiscal fines more generally, you probably heard the evidence session last week, when we heard concerns that there are times when fiscal fines can be used inappropriately. One of the examples given was when the same individual has had multiple fines and has not paid them. Is there anything that you would like to say on the appropriate use of fiscal fines?
I will combine my questions, in the interest of time. Will you also comment on what information victims are given when a case has been dealt with by way of a fiscal fine?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Fulton MacGregor
Will you comment on the point about victims?