The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2027 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mairi Gougeon
That would probably cut across into areas of planning legislation, so I am hesitant to set out what that could look like or where the most appropriate place for changes would be, if they were to be made.
Obviously, our national parks have different planning powers as it is and, should a new national park be created in the future, those powers would be designed to suit the national park authority’s needs. That would potentially be a lot more complex an area than the bill could cover.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mairi Gougeon
It is really concerning to hear that. The independent facilitators, Outside the Box, who were undertaking the engagement work with NatureScot, picked up on that concern and noted some of the behaviour at the engagement events, which was not what we would want to see. We should be able to engage, have a discussion and debate points, as I said earlier, without intimidatory behaviour. People should feel free to express their views, whether they are for or against a proposal.
It comes back to the work that we can do earlier in the process to try to prevent polarisation, so that we can have an open and honest conversation about serious issues and concerns, such as those that were identified during the consultation process. People had legitimate concerns about issues in the area.
We need to be able to have conversations in a constructive way in order to avoid some of the issues that you have described. We have to reflect on the recommendations and move forward in a positive way.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mairi Gougeon
That will be the case for the remainder of this parliamentary session. It will be a decision for a future Government to take in the next session.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mairi Gougeon
I do not think that there would have been much point in stopping the consultation midway through. It was important for that exercise to reach its conclusion, so I would not have agreed to a proposal to halt the consultation when it was only halfway through its established timeframe.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mairi Gougeon
Sorry—are you talking about any misinformation in the campaign?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mairi Gougeon
“Cultural heritage” is defined in the 2000 act as including
“structures and other remains resulting from human activity of all periods, language, traditions, ways of life”
and so on. I think that adding an aim of cultural development is important, because it takes that a step further. It is not just about sitting still and appreciating what we have; it is also about how we can develop that further, into the future. To me, that means also looking at how we can help to develop the creative sectors, for example. It could well mean supporting other community projects related to the creative sector and arts. I see that addition as a positive step forward.
If committee members feel that further definitions or changes to the language are needed, I would be happy to look at that. I am keen to hear what recommendations members might have.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mairi Gougeon
Absolutely. Food would fall under a few different elements of the aims. The element of cultural heritage and development, which is important, or that of economic development would capture all those aspects.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mairi Gougeon
I imagine that, given the length of time that the national parks have had experience of producing their plans, that is not a particular concern; I have not been made aware of that causing issues. The park plans always start from the premise of collaboration and engagement with the relevant public bodies and other authorities. Because of the strong relationships and the collaboration that happens there, I do not see that being an issue. I do not know whether the committee has heard about that in evidence.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mairi Gougeon
I think that some of the amendments that we covered yesterday were in relation to the local place plans and what could be set out in the land management plans. An amendment that was supported yesterday was around what consideration land management plans should give to local place plans. We could potentially consult on the matter in relation to national park plans as part of the overall regulations and guidance that we would be delivering for land management plans. The issue could be considered in that work; it is important that we have that consultation and engagement on it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Mairi Gougeon
I am not aware of that proposal. I would have to look at it in detail and consider the implications. I am more than happy to follow up with you directly on that, or to provide that information to the committee, if that would be helpful.