The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2050 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Mairi Gougeon
Of course, we would not want to do that, but that is essentially what the committee would allow to happen if the SSI were annulled. If more work was to be done, that would take time, during which the protection would not be in place. That would be during spawning time, which is a short window.
I have covered the other issues in my previous remarks, so I draw to a close in highlighting that aspect to the committee.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Mairi Gougeon
The decision is based on the best available scientific evidence. In the time that was available, it would not have been possible to conduct all the scientific research to fill the gaps that have been identified while ensuring that the SSI was in place to provide protections for the spawning period. We have based the decision on the best available scientific evidence and research.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Mairi Gougeon
I think that the ultimate consequences of not basing decisions on the best possible evidence would be that you could take the wrong decisions. If we do not take the precautionary approach, we could end up doing more harm than good to the stock.
I missed the first part of your question. Was it about the methodology?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Mairi Gougeon
Are you talking about the methodology on which we have based these decisions and the views of other bodies in relation to that?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Mairi Gougeon
We have published all the evidence and information on which we based our decision, and it is all publicly available on our website.
This has predominantly been a risk-based approach that has been based on the evidence and science that we have. That comes back to what Dr Needle and Allan Gibb said about the science around the impact of disturbance, on which we have, ultimately, based the policy decision. Dr Needle might want to say more about that.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Mairi Gougeon
Yes.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Mairi Gougeon
I do not agree with that assertion at all. If members look back to the results from the consultations that we held between September and October and between October and November, they will see that there were strong representations in them, and the overwhelming majority wanted the exemptions to be removed in their entirety. It is important that we take all those views into consideration, but I go back to what I said earlier. I believe that the position that we have reached meets the policy objective and strengthens the objective of protecting spawning cod by removing potential disturbance to the areas in which we believe the cod are spawning, while balancing that with the socioeconomic impacts.
I highlight what I said at the beginning of the meeting. The whole process has been far from ideal, and I have apologised for that, but it is important for me, in this role and position, to listen in order to ensure that we balance the objectives. I believe that we have, ultimately, ended up making the right decision with the revised closure area that we have proposed.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Mairi Gougeon
I am not saying that that is okay—that is why we undertake impact assessments of what the overall impact will be—but it is consistent with measures that we have introduced in other closures, which is why compensation has not been considered.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Mairi Gougeon
I can probably answer for the activities that we are undertaking now and that we are looking to undertake. The policy objective that we are pursuing is the protection of spawning cod and, ultimately, boosting the numbers of cod in the Clyde. That is the objective that we are pursuing.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Mairi Gougeon
I am sorry, but I do not really understand what point you are trying to get to.