Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1931 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Circular Economy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 25 June 2024

Monica Lennon

There is a lot of agreement on this group, and we certainly support all the amendments in it. My amendment 77 seeks to mirror my earlier amendment 72, which was already debated in group 2 and agreed to. Amendment 77 is about ensuring that the application of due diligence in relation to environmental protection and human rights is exercised in supply chains. That would ensure that those issues are taken into account when ministers produce secondary legislation, and it would provide consistency between sections 1(3) and 6(2), for the same reasons that I set out earlier.

I thank members for their comments, and I ask them to support Sarah Boyack’s amendment 100. As I said, we support all the amendments in the group.

Meeting of the Parliament

Circular Economy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Meeting date: 25 June 2024

Monica Lennon

This is a really important contribution from Mark Ruskell. For clarity, I take this opportunity to say that amendment 104 seeks to place a duty on the minister when creating secondary legislation under section 13. It is not about putting that duty on to local authorities directly. Throughout the scrutiny of the bill, we have heard that there is a real appetite for more activity on reuse, and our local authorities are certainly looking for more guidance and support on that. Mark Ruskell says that he feels a bit frustrated; I would say that that is putting it politely. I have to say, in the gentlest possible way, that the minister’s explanation seemed a little bit on the weak side. I take the point about the importance of co-production, in the spirit of the Verity house agreement, but the issue is not one of directly imposing a duty on to local authorities.

It is important to embed reuse into the bill as much as we can. Amendment 104 simply adds that we should

“make further provision for the promotion of reuse to assist local authorities to achieve their targets”.

I am seeking to be helpful here, and I think that there is cross-party support for the intention behind the amendment. I hope that the Government can give it full consideration.

I am grateful to Mark Ruskell for giving way.

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 19 June 2024

Monica Lennon

The minister will know that almost 23,000 people have signed a petition that urges the Scottish Government to stop the downgrading of Lanarkshire’s neonatal intensive care unit. It is important that my constituents believe that their voices are being heard.

The Scottish Government says that parents are key partners in the care of their babies and that we should do everything possible to keep mothers and babies together. That said, how can the Scottish Government continue with the devastating downgrading plans, when ignoring the pleas to save the Wishaw neonatal intensive care unit would force families to be apart at a vulnerable and critical time?

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 19 June 2024

Monica Lennon

To ask the Scottish Government whether it will proceed with its reported plans to downgrade the neonatal intensive care unit at University hospital Wishaw. (S6O-03599)

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 June 2024

Monica Lennon

I will bring us back to net zero, because that was starting to sound like an interesting discussion.

We know that land and land use have the biggest role in Scotland’s emission of greenhouse gases. Do the owners of large landholdings have a moral and societal responsibility to promote net zero and climate change measures? If we agree on that point, is it reasonable to accept that there should be obligations on the biggest emitters to reduce their emissions? If so, how could the bill be strengthened and improved in that area? I am looking at Mr Macleod in particular.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 June 2024

Monica Lennon

I do not want to push you beyond your remit, but I will go back to Don Macleod’s point that the polluter should pay. If we are looking at responsibilities and obligations, would it be fair to say that there should be an evidence base on the impact of certain activities? Is it better to look at it as being about ensuring that there is clarity on any impact and what should be an appropriate form of compensation or mitigation?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 June 2024

Monica Lennon

Thank you.

Issues of local context and the role of ministers in making decisions have come up. How might the process be improved to take account of local context? Is it appropriate that ministers make the decision, or is there another way in which that could be done more proportionately?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 June 2024

Monica Lennon

Just one, convener—it is on small landholdings. From the written submissions, I think that the Faculty of Advocates and the Law Society of Scotland are broadly supportive of the small landholders provisions, but in Turcan Connell’s—

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 June 2024

Monica Lennon

Okay. I will let you expand on that in a moment.

In contrast, the Turcan Connell submission raises concerns. You state that you disagree with those provisions and that

“The Bill introduces some rights for small landholders from croft tenure and others from 1991 act tenure which could result in”

unnecessary complexity. Can you expand on what rights you are referring to?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 18 June 2024

Monica Lennon

That is helpful—thank you.