The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1732 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
I see that Linda Gillespie does not wish to comment. That is fine.
I will move on to land management plans. The plans are required to set out how the land is being managed in a way that contributes to achieving net zero, adapting to climate change and increasing or sustaining biodiversity. Is that adequate, or are there other criteria that it might be appropriate to include? Should those be addressed through primary or secondary legislation?
Josh Doble is again maintaining eye contact, so we will go to him.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
We have had evidence that suggests that large landholdings are more likely to attract private investment and deliver against woodland and peatland targets at pace and scale. Is that the witnesses’ view, or do you have a body of evidence or examples of smaller landholdings achieving that or working together to deliver at scale?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
Jon, you have been nominated.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
If we have more small landholdings, is there more scope for collaboration and working differently?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
I will stick with land management plans. Is there a risk that production of the plans will become quite a formulaic exercise with a big role for external consultants, such that we start to lose meaningful engagement with communities? Does anyone have a view on that or any advice to the committee, as we look at this part of the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
I just wanted to be clear about that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 5 November 2024
Monica Lennon
Thank you for that.
To expand on my initial question that I put to all the witnesses, you might remember that, back in April, the Scottish Government announced a consultation on a new carbon tax on large estates to incentivise peatland restoration, tree planting and renewable energy generation. Do you have a view on that proposal? Do you agree or disagree that taxation is the best way to achieve decarbonising land use and agriculture? I do not know whether anyone has a strong view on that or wants to go first. I will go to Josh Doble, and then to Jon Hollingdale.
09:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Monica Lennon
No—I do not agree with that. I think that the bill as it is currently drafted, in using the term “have regard to”, is weaker than many of us would like it to be; the evidence that we heard at stage 1 reflects that.
My amendments would strengthen the requirement to act in accordance with CCC advice, but they would provide for a departure where there are “exceptional” circumstances. In my view, that would be a better balance than what is currently in the bill.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Monica Lennon
I am pleased to have worked with the Scottish Government on amendment 57. The amendment would require the Scottish Government to lay a section 36 report within six months of a target being reported as missed. The amendment would replace the current requirement for such a report to be laid
“As soon as reasonably practical”
after the report that indicated that the target had been missed. Ministers would continue to be required to set out proposals and policies to compensate in future years for excess emissions resulting from any missed target.
I heard what Mark Ruskell said about his amendment 13. I gently suggest to members that, given that I have worked closely with the Government on the issue following stage 1 evidence, they should support my amendment 57 as the alternative.
I do not intend to speak to all the other amendments. I was looking for clarification from Douglas Lumsden in relation to his amendments 39 and 40, because I thought that they were alternatives to each other. I understand the intent behind Graham Simpson’s amendment 23, but I am concerned that it would be too impractical or place too much demand on the Scottish Government, given that we have amendment 48, which would provide a mechanism for ministers to monitor whether the Government is on track to meet a carbon budget and take remedial action when it is off track.
I have no further comments to add.
12:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Monica Lennon
Okay—I do not want us to get too distracted from the issue at hand today. As a Parliament, we have decisions to make and we want to get the best possible system for franchising, because that is what we want to happen. The issue comes down to the question of time and delay. Although I am sympathetic to the principle behind the motion to annul and what it is trying to achieve, when I saw it, my concern was that it could lead to delays and get in the way of franchising. However, no franchising proposal is sitting on the table right now. Therefore, I am interested to know when the Government expects the first proposal for franchising to reach approval stage. I am trying to understand how much time we have to play with.