The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1961 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Monica Lennon
I have a brief question for Elspeth Macdonald. I know that the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation is opposed to the bill, and that has been your position from the very beginning and throughout the early consultation and development of the proposals. I am therefore guessing that you would never come to the Parliament to support an ecocide bill.
Earlier this morning, we heard from a witness about major oil disasters such as the MV Braer, although we are not saying that that is an example of an ecocide crime because the law did not exist at the time. Could you say something about the potential impact on your members of widespread pollution and disruption that could happen in the future? What could that do to a business such as those that your members conduct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Monica Lennon
Would anyone like to add to that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Monica Lennon
I will make this the final question because I am also keen to hear from the second panel of witnesses. We know that the EU environmental crime directive has become quite well established and that it will come fully into effect for member states in May next year. What risks might there be if Scotland does not criminalise ecocide? What might be the attitude in the EU and other jurisdictions to doing business with Scotland if we do not keep pace on the matter?
Sue, can you respond first?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Monica Lennon
You have rightly highlighted the importance of food production and food security. The Nature Friendly Farming Network, which represents some farmers, supports an ecocide law because it wants greater protection for soils, wildlife, forests and biodiversity. Do you recognise that ecocide law is coming into force in other countries because of the benefits that it can have for farmers and food producers, who can also be the victims of ecocide-level crime?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Monica Lennon
Thank you for your evidence. I am open to listening.
My final question is primarily for Professor Parsons, but Catherine McWilliam is welcome to contribute, too. Under the terms of the bill as drafted, Professor Parsons, as a Scottish Water director, you could be culpable if there were an ecocide crime. I will not give any examples, but water companies have illegally discharged raw or untreated sewage into rivers and seas, which has caused significant damage and resulted in significant fines. What would an ecocide law mean in practice for directors such as you and for discussions in boardrooms such as that of Scottish Water? What practical difference would it make to how you approach governance, prevention, culture and behaviour throughout the organisation? How much internal discussion has there been in Scottish Water about its position on an ecocide law? Have the discussions gone beyond director level?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Monica Lennon
I will try to squeeze quite a lot in here. I am conscious of the time, and we have had some really good evidence today.
I will come to you first, Jonnie. I read NFU Scotland’s written submission to the committee with interest. I want to be clear about this in my mind, as some of what you have said today differs from some of the written comments that you made. In your written submission you say that NFU Scotland is
“broadly supportive of the overall aim of the Bill to criminalise the most serious forms of environmental harm.”
You go on to say that you
“understand that the Bill intends to fill a gap between existing environmental regulations and criminal law, similar to other Ecocide legislation found across other countries, and acts as a deterrent for the most egregious and reckless actions that could cause irreversible damage to ecosystems.”
You also say that
“The Bill will be unlikely to affect day-to-day operations of most agricultural businesses”
and that you
“are satisfied with the number of safeguards within the Bill,”
while calling for “clearer guidance”.
I just want to check, because the committee will look at written and oral evidence. Is there anything in your written evidence that you want to change or clarify?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Monica Lennon
I will take that. That is good news.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Monica Lennon
Thank you.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Monica Lennon
On a point of order, Deputy Presiding Officer. I could not connect—I would have voted yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 September 2025
Monica Lennon
I just want to add briefly that this has been an important petition, and I thank the petitioner and the other stakeholders who contributed to our scrutiny of it. It is right that we write to the Scottish Government again for an update and some clarity, and I agree with Mark Ruskell’s points about the importance of keeping pace with the WHO guidelines. I am sure that, if there are opportunities in the time that we have left, the committee will ask suitable questions, but this should be an important issue for future committees in the next session of Parliament.