The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1523 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Monica Lennon
Your written evidence says that the size of the landholding for the management plan threshold is “arbitrary” and requires “further explanation”. Given that we are at stage 1, what explanation would you like from the Scottish Government? What is your view on the threshold size?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Monica Lennon
I promise that I want to talk about the future as well, but first I want to go back to a couple of points. It was fascinating to hear you say that the process that was being asked for in terms of the ferries was not particularly complex. Will you explain a bit more what you mean by that? Lots of people across the country see ferries that were massively overdue and over budget, and to them, it feels quite complex and quite messy. Will you explain what you mean by the process not being particularly complex?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Monica Lennon
Are you able to explain what project domino is?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Monica Lennon
It would be interesting to see those papers.
I know that you probably see a lot of paperwork, but I am looking at the annex of information released following a freedom of information request. On page 4, it talks about project domino and a submission to the Scottish Government. Do you not recall project domino?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Monica Lennon
I did, thank you.
Andrew Miller, I am sorry to hear that you have been unable to appoint a new CEO. Does the way in which David Tydeman, the previous official, was sacked have any bearing on your ability to recruit?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Monica Lennon
I cannot hear the answer, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Monica Lennon
I have questions about section 4, on lotting.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Monica Lennon
Before I move on to Gemma Cooper, I note that you mentioned timescales. Do you have a view of what a reasonable timescale would look like?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Monica Lennon
I want to ask about the community right-to-buy provisions. I hope that I get this right—the proposal is for a 1,000-hectare threshold; we have just heard about the land management plan, for which there is a 3,000-hectare threshold. We have heard different views on the matter, with some stakeholders advocating for a threshold of 500 hectares. I am interested to hear what you think the evidence base is for the proposed 1,000-hectare threshold, and what the relative advantages and disadvantages are.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Monica Lennon
I think that you have raised some important points. However, given that, as you have said, lotting happens anyway, it sounds like we need more clarity on what will be taken into account with regard to community sustainability.
You have rightly talked about national outcomes and national objectives, but what would need to be changed in the bill to ensure that decision makers were striking the right balance between, say, the environmental impact in terms of biodiversity or net zero and other things such as housing needs or local access? Do you think that it would be right to address that in the bill itself, or would it be more appropriate to put that in guidance?