Seòmar agus comataidhean

I was interested to hear Bill Reeve’s comment that what the trade unions are saying pretty much aligns with what the public are feeling and saying. Given your engagement with the trade unions, what is your take on their “A Vision for Scotland’s Railways” document? It sets out a number of recommendations. I will not, you will be pleased to hear, run through them all, but they include reducing ticket prices instead of having a fares freeze and offering free rail travel for the under-24s and the over-60s. Are you sympathetic to such recommendations?

Again, given that we are in a cost of living crisis and given that we know that many people have been priced out of using the trains, it would be good for that work to be accelerated.

Good morning. I recognise a lot of what has been said about safety, particularly for women. Something that concerned me last year was reports in the media that there has been a consistent trend of girls assaulting other girls on trains, particularly in the west of Scotland, with the British Transport Police describing it as a consistent trend. Minister, what discussions have you had with the BTP in that regard?

Mick Hogg from RMT Scotland was very complimentary last week about his early talks with you, minister. He also talked about taking tougher action on known perpetrators of antisocial behaviour. I do not think that banning young girls from the trains would be the answer—I think that the cohort tends to be between 12 and 16. However, is work going on more widely in schools and through youth engagement to find out what is at the root of that antisocial behaviour, which is difficult for passengers and for staff?

So, there is a willingness to put into practice a zero tolerance approach towards any antisocial behaviour or criminality on the railways. Will the scoping exercise on the potential for legislation form part of the work on the national conversation?

I would like to return to the issue of trade union engagement. We had a useful session last week, and the minister has already made several references to her many meetings with trade unions. It sounds like the situation is quite positive.

This might have been superseded, but, last week, we heard concerns from the Transport Salaried Staffs Association about the offer of union representation at board level in the new ScotRail. It was not clear whether that would be a trade union or staff representative place or whether it would be just a regular board member place. Has that been bottomed out?

But is it your position that you are not in favour of compulsory redundancies on our railways?

The good news is that we have already demonstrated in Scotland the affordability of free bus travel for the under-22s and others, and there is a wider campaign to extend that. The minister’s point about making sure that public transport is joined up and integrated is important.

My final question is on the fair fares review. What is the timescale for that, and how can the public engage with it?

I thank the committee for having me back. I am grateful for the work that has been done and the submissions that have been made to the committee, and I welcome much of what the cabinet secretary has said. I had a brief chat with Karen McKeown this morning—we are in regular contact—and she is really grateful for the attention that the committee is paying to the petition. She knows that you will understand the issues because of your local experience in helping constituents.

I was struck by some of the comments in the SAMH response. One that stands out is:

“recovering and renewing the previous system will not be good enough.”

That is absolutely correct. The Royal College of Psychiatrists has also made some important points. It talks about needing a “radical refresh” of the current mental health strategy and, importantly, about the experience of the workforce, who are already stretched and exhausted. We know that burn-out is a real issue for clinicians and people on the front line in healthcare roles.

I hope that the petition will be kept open and that we will do everything possible to ensure that people do not fall through the gaps. The Government clearly has good intentions, but there are legitimate questions about the additional resource and how it will be used. I go back to the point, which SAMH makes eloquently, that we have to do more than just recover and renew the system. We know that it was far from perfect and, sadly, too many people have fallen into crisis, or deeper into crisis, For many, that has resulted in them losing their lives. We know that suicide can be prevented.

I am here to again offer my support to my very courageous constituent Karen McKeown. Karen has been a real rock to many other people who have found themselves in a similar dark place. Nothing will ever make up for her loss. Karen will not mind me saying that, following Luke’s death, it has been an on-going battle for her and her young children to get support. Karen’s son has autism and her daughter has required on-going support. I want to be honest with the committee, because I represent people who rely on NHS Lanarkshire, that the support is not always there—the waiting times are excruciating. As members know, that is not unique to Lanarkshire.

We have to keep everything on the table. We have to let people right across Scotland know that there is no complacency on the issue. People’s lives are worth more than any amount of money. The points that Karen has made about ensuring that the money and resources get to the right places are important, and we must continue to listen to lived experience, including that of many of the workforce, who have their own mental health issues.

I know that the committee gets a lot of petitions, so I am grateful to you for the time that you have given to this one, which is relevant to everyone in Scotland. I know that, no matter what happens next, Karen will continue to fight to ensure that the system improves so that no one falls through the gaps. The convener read out the statistics. Karen is beavering away with her own freedom-of-information requests, but we know that, when people present at A and E and do not get the help that they need, it is an appalling missed opportunity. There is space to provide more specialist support in order to try to ensure that we have a trauma-informed support response across the board. Thank you for listening.

That was really helpful. Do you have anything to add, Michael?

Robert and Mick, do you have anything to add?