The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1986 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Monica Lennon
Thank you—that was helpful.
I have a question on enforcement. Another issue that has been raised is whether SEPA currently has enough resources and expertise to deal with complaints and cases that come to it at the moment, because a lot of its work is intelligence led. If the bill was passed, would it raise any issues about enforcement for SEPA or any other body?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Monica Lennon
As there are no more comments on that issue, I will move on to a final point. The notion of a deterrent has come up a couple of times. The witnesses have recognised that, when policy makers talk about ecocide, they are talking about the most severe instances—events that might happen only extremely rarely. In the bill, we talk about the likelihood of a sentence of between 10 and 20 years. Do you want to say anything about the sufficiency of the current deterrents?
10:45Another issue that has been raised is that of how we can better inform and educate the public, given that science and knowledge of environmental harm issues change all the time. Could anything be done to raise awareness of the legal framework that we currently have in Scotland? How could we create more of a deterrent effect?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Monica Lennon
Thank you, convener. Good morning.
I was interested in the analysis that there is nothing lacking in the existing legislation with regard to being able to prosecute for an ecocide-level crime. We have heard from other witnesses who take the view that it could be argued that we are seeing some policy divergence between the situation that is emerging in the European Union in relation to how the environmental crime directive has been adopted by member states and the situation in Scotland.
I want to get some clarity on that. Is Scotland keeping pace with the European Union, or is there anything that could or should be done to make sure that everything is in alignment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Monica Lennon
Maybe I misunderstood what you said earlier, but the Government’s position is that, in order to align with the policy and legal direction in the EU, we need to look at how we give effect to ecocide law. One option that the Scottish Government looked at was amending the 2014 act, but no such proposal has been made.
Other stakeholders, witnesses and people who responded to the call for views in an earlier consultation said that there are gaps in environmental governance in Scotland with regard to how people access justice and how things operate. Do you recognise or have a view on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Monica Lennon
Thank you. Do we have time for any more answers, convener? I am in your hands.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Monica Lennon
In relation to gaps in environmental governance, the committee has heard evidence about Scotland not complying with the Aarhus convention and our not having an environmental court. Communities find it expensive and difficult to access things such as judicial review. If you do not recognise that, that is okay. Perhaps other witnesses would like to respond.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Monica Lennon
In September, the Scottish Government wrote to this committee to signal its support for the proposal to introduce an offence of ecocide. Notwithstanding what Suwita Randhawa has said today, the Government has been clear that it sees the offence as involving
“the most extreme, wilful and reckless cases of harm.”
We do not have time for everyone, so I will direct this question to Suwita Randhawa, since I have mentioned her. Do you understand why the Scottish Government has framed its view in that way and wants to make that distinction in people’s minds, that we are talking about the most severe examples? Are there other ways that what you described as the slow-burn or the cumulative impact could be addressed under the existing regulations that we have in Scotland?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Monica Lennon
So there are no improvements that you want to bring to our attention.
Clare Frances, do you have anything to add on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Monica Lennon
Thank you, convener.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Monica Lennon
I am grateful for the opportunity to listen to Clare Haughey’s expertise.
I think that the Wishaw NICU is award winning because of the excellent care by the staff and their close bond with families who have to keep going back there for on-going care.
Does she recognise that that is why the planned changes are so frightening for families, including those who have put the lives of their babies in the hands of that hospital and would not have their babies without it? Does she understand why the calls to pause the review are growing louder and louder, and that we need to do what we can to save that unit?