The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3464 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Richard Leonard
So the answer to my question is yes; it could conceivably stay with Skills Development Scotland.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Richard Leonard
Thank you.
You made an interesting point earlier when you said that, in the context of the programme for government, the Government and the First Minister want a
“national approach to skills planning”.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Richard Leonard
Does the Scottish Government or the minister not have any responsibility for making sure that the outcome of the job evaluation process is an objective assessment of whether people are being paid correctly? Some people may get paid less as a result of the job evaluation, but there is obviously also an expectation that some people will receive an uprating in their pay to reflect their duties. Does the Scottish Government not take any responsibility at all for that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Richard Leonard
Many people have been calling for that for a long time. How do you achieve that when, as we were told earlier in the evidence session, individual colleges work with their regional economies and local employers? How do you get a national strategic approach to skills planning that takes a longer-term view about the direction that the economy is going in and the skills of the future that we will need that might be different or adapted from the skill sets that we are training people for at the moment? How do you reconcile the local and the national?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Richard Leonard
Just to be clear about the process, if the job evaluation exercise is concluded and, as a result, there is a net additional staffing cost for non-teaching staff, the Scottish Government will stump up the money to cover it and hand it over to the Scottish Funding Council, which will, in turn, make sure that colleges can pay the non-teaching staff what they are now due—and there will be a backdated element to that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Richard Leonard
I invite Colin Beattie to put some questions to you next. There are some themes that we might return to before we conclude.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Richard Leonard
We are going to come on to that point. My understanding is that the range of college courses has contracted as a result of those flat-cash settlements and real-terms cuts.
Mr Rennick, I think that you said in your opening statement that learners at our colleges are disproportionately from the least advantaged communities. Have you carried out any equality impact assessments or economic impact assessments of the reduction in courses?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Richard Leonard
I suppose that the fundamental question that people have is about the extent to which these changes are educationally, economically or socially driven and the extent to which they are simply financially driven.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Richard Leonard
Hang on a minute. A commitment to look at the outcome is different from saying that we are going to pay for it or that we will honour it.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Richard Leonard
You say that you are willing to fund the commitment, but that willingness is subject to the amount that is entailed in it. It is subject to whether you approve of the methodology of the job evaluation. It seems that you are dipping in and out with the extent to which you are prepared to intervene in the process.
You are saying, “This is not a matter for the Government; it is a matter for the employers and trade unions to sort out.” If the employers and trade unions sort it out, is it not then the responsibility of the Government to step in and say, “You have carried out a job evaluation. These are the results. There will be some losers, as well as some winners—possibly. How do we deal with that? We have a commitment to those employees, those workers, that they will get—”