The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3214 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Earlier in the meeting, you said that the corporate body had oversight over governance and accountability, which is quite a clear responsibility that lies firmly in the corporate body’s corner.
I have one final question in this area, convener, if I may.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I have a couple of other questions. As I understand it, there are quarterly meetings between the officer-holder services team and the commissioners and related bodies, and Mr Carlaw said that the corporate body now has biannual meetings with each of those post holders. Previously, I think that it might have been an annual session. For the record, could you confirm that that is how the process works at the moment? Is that the frequency of that interaction?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Richard Leonard
No, that is fine.
10:45SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Maggie Chapman mentioned that she has two hats. I have the hat of the convener of the Public Audit Committee. The evidence that we took from the Auditor General was rather contrary to what you have said. He felt—and, as it happens, it is a view that I share—that there is some value in getting the assurance of a stand-alone audit. Last week, we explored that in relation to His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland, which is audited as part of the Scottish Government’s consolidated accounts audit, unlike the Scottish Fiscal Commission, which has its own independent internal audit and is externally audited by Audit Scotland. Have you taken a view on whether there would be merit in combining the audit process for all those public bodies?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I go back to the whole-system perspective. GPs are presumably grappling with the issue of waiting times in secondary care. If people are on long waiting lists to get elective surgery or other procedures, that is presumably leading to an increase in demand on GP services to infill for some of that.
Do you have a view on the necessity of tackling not just the general medical services side of that, but what is going on in secondary care? Presumably, you cannot have success in one area without achieving success in the other.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Richard Leonard
What we are discussing this morning is described as a contract. Is it a woolly, social contract—a voluntary arrangement—or is it a contract in which parties are involved and remedy can be sought? That could be a remedy whereby the Government could say, “As part of the contract, you promised to provide us with data, which you are not doing. You are in breach of the contract.” Or, on the other side, GPs might say, “You promised to give us the resources to have multidisciplinary teams and you haven’t done that. You promised to put resources into secondary care to stop the logjam falling back on us and you haven’t.”
Is it a contract in the sense that people have any access to a remedy if there is a breach of contract?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Richard Leonard
On that note, I will draw the public part of this morning’s session to a close. Before I do so, I thank our witnesses this morning—Eva Thomas-Tudo, who joined us online, Fiona Lees, Carol Calder and the Auditor General. You have given us quite a lot of food for thought and we will need to consider whether we would like to quiz other people about some of the recommendations and outcomes of the very important report that we have been discussing.
11:34 Meeting continued in private until 12:05.Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Well, until half past 11 at least.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the 15th meeting of the Public Audit Committee in 2025. We have received apologies from Stuart McMillan, so I welcome Stephanie Callaghan, who is substituting for Stuart. She is attending virtually for this, her first Public Audit Committee meeting.
Because it is your first meeting, Stephanie, I ask you to declare any relevant interests.