The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3102 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the 21st meeting in 2024 of the Public Audit Committee, which is our first after the Parliament’s summer recess. Fulton MacGregor is joining us remotely.
First, are members content to take agenda items 4, 5 and 6 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Richard Leonard
I have a quick question before I bring in our final questioner. We read in the report that the Government proposes having a “minimum digital living standard”. Could you tell us a little bit more about what on earth that is?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Richard Leonard
Thank you. That is helpful.
I will move on. Our final questioner is Fulton MacGregor, who, fittingly, given the topic of this morning’s evidence, is joining us digitally, by video link, from North Lanarkshire.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Richard Leonard
We have time for one final quick question, which I invite the deputy convener to put.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Richard Leonard
On that very cautious note, I will draw the meeting to a close.
I thank Mike Neilson from the Accounts Commission, Bernie Milligan and Jillian Matthew from Audit Scotland and of course the Auditor General for the useful evidence that they have given.
We will consider what our next steps will be. I thank you very much, indeed, for your customary willingness to be as open and wide ranging as our questions ask you to be.
10:36 Meeting continued in private until 11:30.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Richard Leonard
It is pretty plain that no one wants a visit from you any time soon, is it not? Things have gone wrong if you are knocking on their door.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Richard Leonard
You have mentioned on the record your aspirations around where you want to be and by when. As Professor Alexander said, to some extent, our job is to challenge and scrutinise, and that is what we are trying to do this morning.
I will go to another area, which is the operating cost variances that we see in the report and accounts. Why, even though a substantial increase in budget for 2023-24 was sought in that budget—with regard to rent and rates, for example—do we see an underspend? Why, when a substantial increase in budget was sought this year in relation to travel and subsistence, do we see a significant underspend? Why, when a substantial increase was sought in relation to legal and professional fees, do we see a substantial underspend? Can you explain that?
11:00Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Richard Leonard
The variances do not just cover underspends but overspends as well. Things such as IT costs are significantly more than what was budgeted for. Again, Mr Dennis, I suspect that we will get into the murky world of accommodation and international accounting standards, but other accommodation costs—I am not entirely sure what that line covers—were 40 per cent above budget as well. From the point of view of challenge and scrutiny in this public forum, could you explain why there were substantial overspends in those areas?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Richard Leonard
Can I just probe that a little bit more? My reading is that the good compliance record was much higher the year before—the percentage was in the 80s. Is that evidence of things going in the right direction, or is it evidence of things going in the wrong direction?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 24 June 2024
Richard Leonard
The report says that there are examples of insufficient “challenge of management”. That has not affected the outcome of the assurance around the audit; it is just a methodology thing. Is that what is being said there?