The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3102 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Richard Leonard
Mr MacRae, you were very bullish there, saying that you needed the best legal advice. Did that go out to any procurement process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Richard Leonard
But, Mr MacRae, you were answering questions in the context of the KC’s retention. Did the position of the retained KC—formerly Queen’s counsel—go through any tendering process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Richard Leonard
Graham Simpson wants to come in, and then I will go to James Dornan.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Richard Leonard
Well, no, you called it “pushback”.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much indeed. I want to place on record the committee’s thanks for the amount of information that has been provided. There was a delay in publication because some of the information had to be redacted, but we will come to the substance of some of those documents and what they tell us.
It was useful for Mr MacRae to remind us at the outset that the whole purpose of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland is to ensure that Scottish Water provides
“long-term value and best-in-class levels of service”.
I am sure that, this morning, we will scrutinise whether WICS lives up to those standards.
Mr McGill, in October 2023, Audit Scotland sent you an email regarding the business case for the Harvard business school course, in which it questioned why expenditure of more than £20,000 required approval by the Scottish Government, when the board’s approval level was for expenditure of more than £100,000. I think that the expression that was used in that email was:
“this seems the wrong way around”.
Have you addressed that issue?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Richard Leonard
Do you expect that to be before the October recess, for example?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Richard Leonard
Do you think that it will be before Christmas?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Richard Leonard
I have been once before in relation to the treatment of young footballers.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 11 September 2024
Richard Leonard
I will get straight into the points that I want to raise. First, the recommendations that led to the proposals to downgrade Wishaw neonatal unit have not been subject to a robust or thorough equality or human rights impact assessment. That is an issue in relation to parents and families but also in relation to babies, because they, too, have rights under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child—a right to life, a right to survival and a right to development—and that has not been properly taken into account.
Secondly, the clinical advice that has been used to justify the decision is now five years old. Thirdly, neither the current minister nor her predecessors have ever visited the Wishaw neonatal unit to speak to the staff there to get their expert view. Fourthly, as Jackie Baillie and Monica Lennon have mentioned, the concentration of the provision of these intensive care resources will bring about capacity and resilience issues. It is extremely difficult to understand the feasibility of families from central and southern Scotland having to go to Aberdeen, which will have one of the proposed three centres.
There has been centralisation of these services in other parts of the UK, but there has not been any proper evaluation of those that could be factored into any decisions that the Scottish Government takes. ScotSTAR and the Scottish Ambulance Service will be significantly affected by the changes and they have not been fully involved in the process. There has been no assessment of the impact on their services.
Finally, this is an issue in Lanarkshire and in Wishaw but there is also an issue about how we provide these services across the whole of Scotland. That is an issue for every member of this committee and every member of this Parliament. We simply ask this committee to take up some of these issues in relation to the extent to which the assessments have been made, the impact on staff, the impact on capacity, the impact on resilience and the impact not just on human rights but human lives.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Richard Leonard
That is okay. I will bring Graham Simpson in to ask a quick question in a minute, but it is striking that, in the introduction to the report, in paragraph 6, you say:
“Digital exclusion is strongly associated with poverty and people with certain protected characteristics.”
You go on to say, in paragraph 13, that digital exclusion is caused by affordability, by whether people have digital skills, by whether they “fear or mistrust” digital systems and by poor connectivity or being unable to afford to keep up with technological change.
09:15In paragraph 16, you reiterate that the major causes of digital exclusion are poverty—including being on benefits—and age, because older people are presumably less likely to be able to access digital technology. You say that people with disabilities and those who are socially isolated must overcome barriers to access. That gives a clear sense of those people among our citizens who are predominantly excluded from public services that are digitally provided.