The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3214 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Written authority.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I will move things along straight away and ask Colin Beattie to put some questions to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Briefly, Graham.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
In the interests of time, I will go straight to the deputy convener.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
We indeed have questions on the areas that you have outlined in your introductory remarks, director general, and we will get to those in due course. Before we get to some of those broader points, I invite Stuart McMillan to put a couple of general questions to you, after which I think that he wants to talk with you in some detail about the FMPG situation.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
You mentioned FMI’s track record and its intellectual property rights. When it was commissioned to do that work, was it required to disclose who else it worked for?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
No, I am not asking a legal question. I am asking whether FMI is subject to any risk if it is hired to carry out due diligence, for example, and things do not pan out according to its advice. Is there any clawback? What responsibility rests with it?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
As the saying goes, the proof of the pudding will be in the eating.
I want to tie up a few loose ends before we finish the evidence session. First, on that last point, why on earth are there any commercial confidentiality issues around the terms of reference for the study by FMI?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
The Public Audit Committee deals with optimism bias a lot of the time, but, this morning, I think that we are experiencing some pessimism bias. I do not think that it is unreasonable to expect that the objective terms of reference of a piece of work that has been commissioned by the Scottish Government should be in the public domain.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Again, we will view that in light of future experience.
I turn to the other issue that we have been looking at this morning, but have not significantly dwelt on. Again, I just want to run through this as a matter of record. One of the pieces of information that you disclosed to us in February, which was quite transparent and open of you, was the EY study into BiFab. At the end of that report, EY made a series of recommendations to the Scottish Government about how it might improve things in future cases.
As we have touched on already, the report spoke about identifying
“key sectors ... of strategic importance”
that the Government ought to identify. It also said that
“SCAD should ... engage with public sector agencies”.
We have heard a little about how that goes on, although I would be interested to know whether the Scottish National Investment Bank is part of that engagement process.
I turn to three particular recommendations in that report, and I will ask you, director general, whether you have implemented those recommendations.
One was a recommendation that the Scottish Government
“should establish a standardised triage process for intervention requests”
in order to establish a “go/no-go” decision framework. Have you done that?