The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3214 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I understand that.
The final recommendation—again, you alluded to this much earlier in this morning’s evidence session—that I want to put to you was about the establishment of
“a ‘Shareholder’ function with responsibility for managing ongoing interventions.”
I do not know whether, to all intents and purposes, that is the strategic commercial assets division’s—
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
What is the situation now? I refer to the comments of Mr Gupta, the executive chairman of the GFG Alliance, in his press release in February. He said that the agreement was a
“great relief ... It will enable us to push on from the deep challenges caused ... we are confident of being able to access longer-term financing to build on the significant investments we have already made”.
What does that mean for Lochaber, Motherwell or Clydebridge?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I will finish with this point. Earlier in the meeting, Mr Rhatigan, I think, said that he thought that the GFG Alliance arrangement in Lochaber meant that the Scottish Government had “big exposure”. The committee’s continuing interest in the fortunes and business performance of the GFG Alliance, with the Serious Fraud Office inquiries and all the other things that go along with that, lies in what exposure that places on the Scottish Government and Scottish public funds. We therefore retain a keen interest in this area.
On that note, I will have to draw this morning’s proceedings to a close. We have run quite a way over our anticipated time.
I thank our witnesses, Dermot Rhatigan, Colin Cook and director general Gregor Irwin, for their attendance and willingness to answer our questions. Thank you very much for your evidence this morning.
11:41 Meeting continued in private until 12:05.Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I will bring the deputy convener back in a little bit later, but Graham Simpson has some questions to put to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the 16th meeting in 2025 of the Public Audit Committee. Agenda item 1 is for the committee to decide whether to take agenda items 3, 4 and 5 in private. Do we agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Agenda item 2 is consideration of the Scottish Government’s approach to financial interventions, in particular the strategic commercial assets division and its work. I am very pleased to welcome Gregor Irwin, who is the director general of economy at the Scottish Government, Colin Cook, who is the Scottish Government’s director of economic development, and Dermot Rhatigan, who is a deputy director and the lead on the strategic commercial assets division. We have some questions to put to you this morning but, before we get to them, I invite you, director general, to make an opening statement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
The default position of the contract with FMI was secrecy, was it not? There are two paragraphs about that in the letter that you wrote to me on 4 April. The first talks about how
“all information will be treated as commercial in confidence by the parties.”
That was the condition of your contractual arrangement with FMI. The second states:
“In addition, FMI applied a disclaimer to the report which requires their consent for the report, or information contained within the report, to be shared beyond the parties to the contract.”
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Do those consultants have any exposure to risk themselves or do they just get a reward from those exercises? If things have not gone well—clearly, they have not gone that well at FMPG—does FMI assume any responsibility?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. We will see what happens in the future.
I turn to some of the other recommendations in the transparency review. Can I get an update from you on where you are with that? You pledged to create a web page with up-to-date information on SCAD and its work. Have you done that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
So that is a no as well.