The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3064 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Richard Leonard
The second item on our agenda is for the committee to consider whether to take agenda items 4 and 5 in private. Are we agreed to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Why then, within two years, was a revision proposed to that contract?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Richard Leonard
One of the other things that strikes me about this is that the initial contract from 2005—which provided the basis for the departure of the former chief executive—gave a contractual entitlement to six months’ pay or salary on resignation, but provided 12 months’ pay or salary in the event of dismissal. Under those terms, it is conceivable that somebody in that position could be sacked for gross misconduct and be entitled to more notice pay than somebody who had handed in their resignation. It is extraordinary. I have never seen anything like that before in my life.
10:15Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Richard Leonard
I want to go back to something quite extraordinary that you told us a few minutes ago. You said that the limit on expenses—presumably for travel, subsistence and business entertainment, as WICS has previously described it—was not adjusted, but removed altogether by the former chief executive officer, who was the accountable officer. Was that approved by anybody—the chair of the board, the chair of the audit and risk committee, the sponsor division, or the deputy director? After all, the committee’s concern throughout much of this has been not just that these things happened, but that they were allowed to happen.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Richard Leonard
When you gave evidence to us in the equivalent session in February of last year in relation to expenses and so on, you said:
“We do not see that type of activity in other audits.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 8 February 2024; c 29.]
Last year, we were dealing with a section 22 report with an almost unheard of list of questions about the way in which the organisation was conducting itself, the way it was allowing governance arrangements to drift, allowing the expenses regime to be run and allowing unreceipted claims to be processed. We are still in that territory in this year’s audit, are we not?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Richard Leonard
I move on to the substantive part of the committee’s agenda this morning, which is consideration of the Auditor General’s section 22 report into the Water Industry Commission for Scotland.
I am pleased to welcome our witnesses, and to wish them a happy new year. We are joined by Stephen Boyle, the Auditor General for Scotland. Alongside the Auditor General is Carole Grant, an audit director at Audit Scotland, and Richard Smith, a senior audit manager at Audit Scotland.
We have a number of questions to put to you on the report. However, before we get to those, I invite the Auditor General to give us a short opening statement.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much. I will begin by speaking about key message number 1, which is that
“The appointed auditor issued a qualified regularity opinion on the 2023/24 audit”.
How many public bodies do you audit, and how often do you issue that kind of qualification?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Richard Leonard
In the past 12 months, for example, how many qualifications have you considered it necessary to issue?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Richard Leonard
Perhaps it would be interesting to look at the contractual terms of other CEOs in non-departmental public bodies to see whether that is the norm and what its genesis was. As we discussed in the evidence sessions on last year’s section 22 report, so many aspects of the operations of WICS appear to be counterintuitive. They appear to be the wrong way round. This strikes me as another example of that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2025
Richard Leonard
By my calculation, it was concluded within 17 days over the Christmas and new year period, so it was, as you say, rapid. You make the point in the report that much more consideration could have been given to other options. The legal advisers could have been asked for an opinion on the revelation that the 2007 contract had not been signed and what its status therefore was. That is the one that provided for three months’ notice pay, rather than six months’ notice pay, under such circumstances.