The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3214 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Richard Leonard
We have some questions about the financial basis on which the bank was established and operates. Those will be put by Colin Beattie.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That goes to one of your recommendations about transparency, does it not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I have a final question before I bring Graham Simpson in. One of the vehicles for investment is taking out an equity stake—I think that that is one of the options that the bank has, is it not? Are there examples of that? When equity stakes have been taken out, is a nominated person from the investment bank on the board of that organisation?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Richard Leonard
It is a very precise figure—92.3 per cent. When I look at the quantum of investments that have been awarded since the bank was established, I note the three biggest investments, at the maximum of £50 million. One went to North Star Shipping Renewables, which is based in Aberdeen—that is fair enough. However, £50 million went to the Ardersier port—to which you have referred already—which is owned by a venture capital company that is based in Houston, Texas. The third investment, in Gresham House Forestry Fund, has been quite controversial and has been raised in Parliament before. The fund is now owned by a private equity company that is based in 5th Avenue, New York.
Maybe this is just a fact of life, but it seems to me that quite a large amount of investment through decisions by the Scottish National Investment Bank has gone to big, private equity-owned international funds rather than to SMEs that are trying to grow their business in the terrain of the Scottish economy.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I am sorry, but this is work that the Scottish Government, using public money, has commissioned a private consultancy company to carry out. Why should we not at least know the scope of its work and its terms of reference?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay, so you have not done that yet.
You pledged to establish a transparency assurance panel to review the sensitivity status of material that is recorded in SCAD’s register of commercial advice. Have you established the transparency assurance panel?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
The answer is not yet, is it not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
You also agreed to a recommendation that emanated from this committee’s work on the arrangements for ferries 801 and 802. The committee took evidence that suggested that there had been direction to the board of CMAL in the guise of shareholder authorisation. Is it correct that you have committed to publishing information about such instances, so that the Parliament will be notified when equivalent things happen in the future?
11:30Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That is fine.
I have one final question, which goes back to the GFG Alliance. You have alluded to proceedings that are currently under way around the specialist steel division, which is part of the GFG Alliance. The committee is also interested in a statement that the GFG Alliance put out in February this year, which was headed
“GFG reaches agreement with Greensill creditors on global debt settlement terms”.
Greensill, which was GFG’s financial backer, went into administration. Could you explain to us what that refinancing agreement means for the businesses that are owned by the GFG Alliance in Scotland?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Excellent. The next recommendation was on the establishment of
“An independent panel ... to provide challenge and review of proposed interventions.”
Have you established that?