The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3298 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
This is bringing back lots of memories for me of meetings with the Scottish Grocers Federation, visiting glass manufacturers in Ayrshire and so on, but that was some time ago.
Stuart McMillan will now put some questions to you about the broader environment that you operate in.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I welcome everybody to the 21st meeting in 2025 of the Public Audit Committee.
Agenda item 1 is for the committee to decide whether to take items 3, 4 and 5 in private. Do we agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
The second item on our agenda is further consideration of the Auditor General for Scotland’s report on the Scottish National Investment Bank. I am pleased to welcome our two witnesses. We are joined by Al Denholm, the chief executive of the Scottish National Investment Bank, and alongside him is Willie Watt, who chairs the Scottish National Investment Bank.
We have some questions to put to both of you based on the Audit Scotland report. Before we get to our questions, Mr Watt, I invite you to give us a short opening statement.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Richard Leonard
We accept, as a commission, that it is not a fixed-fee model and there is not necessarily a capped regime in place, but 21 per cent is quite a big variance, is it not? Given the institutional knowledge that exists in Audit Scotland and your familiarity with the mixed-market approach, when we are asked to approve a budget, we expect that to be more or less the same as the actual spend. I hear what you say, Ms Bibby, about particular cases and so on, but as a rule of thumb, I might expect the variance to be 5 per cent or a single-digit variance from the budget, but this is 21 per cent. That is of fairly large magnitude.
My second question is whether, among the six firms, there are particular firms that have charged significantly more in the audit work that they have been doing.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Richard Leonard
I have a couple of questions on audit delays. Paragraph 20 of the report tells us that 91 audits are delayed. In fact, when I look at it in a bit more detail, it tells me that 91 audits are late and “not making progress”, so they are not just delayed but stuck, it seems to me. I wonder whether you can address that. Can you also address this point? This is probably an unfair way of framing it but, if I could be simple in my approach, at the start of the report you talk about between 233 and 253 audits being completed; if there are 91 delayed audits, that is a ratio of between 35 to almost 40 per cent of audits that are delayed or “late and not making progress”. That is a huge proportion, is it not?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Perhaps I can finish where I started, by going back to your figures, which say that 91 audits are late—or, to use Mr Smith’s terminology, “not making progress” according to his yardstick. However, you also give us a breakdown that, of those 91 cases, 46 are late due to the auditor, 27 are due late to the body that is being audited and 18 are late in circumstances that are “beyond the control of either”. Again, that is your explanation. I am not quite sure what “beyond the control of either” means. How can something be beyond the control of either the auditor or the public body that is being audited? That baffles me.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Richard Leonard
I am sorry—that just reminds me of the narrative that we get on Ferguson Marine, which is that to get the Glen Sannox afloat we have to jeopardise progress on the Glen Rosa, through retrofitting parts from the Glen Rosa on to the Glen Sannox so that at least that vessel is afloat. However, what you described does not solve the problem of what is happening with the public body whose audit is being considerably delayed and jeopardised, does it? I understand that that is the way of working. The reason that I am making facial expressions is because it just reminds me of what we get told on other aspects of audit.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you. I could continue, chair, but I do not think that time permits so I will pass back to you.
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I want to continue to look at your “year in figures” table and turn attention to the fees and expenses that are paid to external firms. You have, for a long time, operated a mixed-market approach to public audit in Scotland, so you outsource about a third of public audits to be carried out by private companies. We approved a budget for the last financial year of £7.7 million, but the table shows that the actual spend was almost £9.5 million. That is a rise of 21 per cent in one year, compared to the budget. Can you explain that?
Meeting of the Commission
Meeting date: 23 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Might you come back next year and share with us another quite big variance in the fees paid, compared to the budget that has been set?