The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3464 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the 17th meeting in 2025 of the Public Audit Committee. Under agenda item 1, does the committee agree to take agenda items 3 and 4 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Can I follow on from that? At paragraph 91 of the report, you give a very precise figure. You say that
“92.3 per cent of ... direct investees”
are small and medium-sized enterprises. Whose figure is that, and how is it derived?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Richard Leonard
The starting point is that, in your report, you quote a figure that you say is an echo of a Scottish National Investment Bank figure, which shows that 92.3 per cent of investees are SMEs. I am challenging that as a likely reliable figure.
There is another point with regard to the Gresham House Forestry Fund. When the investment was first announced in August 2021, I went on to the fund’s website to look at how it positioned itself as a business and saw that it was, largely, selling forestry investment as a way of avoiding paying inheritance tax and capital gains tax. Is any kind of ethical filter applied to these investment decisions?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I think that probably quite a number of us might feel that an organisation whose raison d’être seems to be to help its clients to avoid paying tax should not necessarily be benefiting from public funding to aid its venture. I am not talking about individual directors’ conflicts of interest—I am talking about a conflict of interest between the organisation and its purpose and its resorting to the use of public funds.
Before I move on to something else, another point about the Gresham House Forestry Fund—which is of note, is it not?—is that the bank says that 60 per cent of its investments will be in Scotland. Presumably, therefore, I would deduce that at least 40 per cent are going to be investments elsewhere. I think that that means investments elsewhere in the UK, to be fair, but they are not going to be in Scotland. Is that not subject to some kind of evaluation when decisions have been made about where investments are being placed?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I am sorry, but this is work that the Scottish Government, using public money, has commissioned a private consultancy company to carry out. Why should we not at least know the scope of its work and its terms of reference?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay, so you have not done that yet.
You pledged to establish a transparency assurance panel to review the sensitivity status of material that is recorded in SCAD’s register of commercial advice. Have you established the transparency assurance panel?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
The answer is not yet, is it not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
You also agreed to a recommendation that emanated from this committee’s work on the arrangements for ferries 801 and 802. The committee took evidence that suggested that there had been direction to the board of CMAL in the guise of shareholder authorisation. Is it correct that you have committed to publishing information about such instances, so that the Parliament will be notified when equivalent things happen in the future?
11:30Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That is fine.
I have one final question, which goes back to the GFG Alliance. You have alluded to proceedings that are currently under way around the specialist steel division, which is part of the GFG Alliance. The committee is also interested in a statement that the GFG Alliance put out in February this year, which was headed
“GFG reaches agreement with Greensill creditors on global debt settlement terms”.
Greensill, which was GFG’s financial backer, went into administration. Could you explain to us what that refinancing agreement means for the businesses that are owned by the GFG Alliance in Scotland?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Excellent. The next recommendation was on the establishment of
“An independent panel ... to provide challenge and review of proposed interventions.”
Have you established that?