The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3314 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Richard Leonard
There are still quite a few unanswered questions and we will need to consider how best to respond to them. Willie Coffey has questions to raise.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Richard Leonard
That would be helpful.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Richard Leonard
I do not think that anybody disputes that, Mr Cook, and I will call on Jackie McAllister in a second, but the facts of the matter are that, in the past couple of weeks, the GFG Alliance has been brought to book by Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and it is the subject of a Serious Fraud Office investigation. As you said earlier, permanent secretary, Greensill Capital has collapsed, and there are question marks around the GFG Alliance’s governance structure. Given that the Scottish Government is almost a partner in the enterprise, as it is party to a deal with the GFG Alliance, what contingency plans are you making?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Richard Leonard
Colin Beattie would like to come in.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much. If you feel the need, as you might, to bring in any of your colleagues over the next hour or so, please do so. Similarly, if Lesley Fraser or Alyson Stafford, who are online, wish to come in at any point, they should put an R in the chat function, and we will make sure that they are called to give their evidence.
I want to begin with a short question before I hand over to the rest of the committee. You mentioned governance as an issue and an area in which more work might be required. On 27 January, Michael Oliphant, the audit director in Audit Scotland, told the committee about concerns about “overambition”. He said that target dates and scores could sometimes be “overambitious” and that, as a result, there could be an implementation gap, which is something on which the Auditor General for Scotland has previously reflected.
Will you reflect on the part of the Audit Scotland report on the consolidated accounts? Will you look at the need for more clarity on the action that has been taken in order to allow us to understand better how risk management is being carried out and how risks are being addressed by the Scottish Government?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Richard Leonard
Jackie McAllister wants to come in.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Richard Leonard
Thanks, Auditor General. As usual, feel free to call on Joanne Brown and Graeme Greenhill as appropriate. If they wish to come in at any point, they should put an R in the chat box function and we will ensure that they are called.
Sharon Dowey will ask the first question.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Richard Leonard
For clarity, FReM is “The Government Financial Reporting Manual”. I just want everyone to be clear about that.
10:45Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Richard Leonard
I want to probe the fact that we are sitting with a report that has a disclaimer attached to the audit opinion. Paragraph 3 of the report says:
“Scottish Canals had not obtained a valuation for around £51 million of specialist operational assets which had been capitalised between 2012 and 2021.”
Would you have expected a public corporation—as Scottish Canals was during that period—to have had those assets valued?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Richard Leonard
The value of the canal network in its entirety has never been disclosed in accounts produced by Scottish Canals. What is the reason for that? Is that because the network consists of old, Victorian structures that have never been properly assessed since they were built centuries ago, or is there another reason? Why is that?