The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3287 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
Just for the record, we have not written to them yet. We have indicated that we are going to write to them, but the letters have not dropped through their letter boxes yet.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
As part of that new arrangement, was a commitment given to CMAL that it would be compensated and that its budget would be increased to accommodate the change in the profiling of payments?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
On that note—which is where we might pick things up again in the future—I thank Mr Brannen for his time and the evidence that he has given. I also thank all the members of the team who joined him, including Mo Rooney, who contributed towards the end of the session. As I said, there are whole areas of the report that we think it is important to interrogate. That is one of the reasons why Mr Cook was not called this morning. I am sure that we will get back in touch, Mr Brannen, to see whether we can arrange a follow-up session, because lots of important issues have been raised this morning but we did not quite get to some of the ground that we need to cover. Once again, I thank the witnesses for their time.
I close the public part of this morning’s meeting.
10:40 Meeting continued in private until 11:37.Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
Who would ministerial approval be sought from?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
For the avoidance of doubt, Fran Pacitti said that that did not happen in the case of vessels 801 and 802.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
I will bring in Willie Coffey, who has been itching to come in.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
I am conscious of the time, Colin. I am keen to bring in two members of the committee before we finish up.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
I will take you back to some evidence that we heard from the Auditor General about correspondence on 8 and 9 October 2015 that took place between your predecessor as chief executive of Transport Scotland and Government ministers. An email from Transport Scotland reflected Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd’s concerns about the award of the contract to Ferguson Marine Engineering Ltd. The board of CMAL went so far as to say:
“The Board feel it is their absolute duty to point out the risk to their shareholder and in that respect would expect approval, should SG wish this project to proceed, and to receive direction to that effect”.
The next day, a reply was submitted to Erik Østergaard from the director of aviation, maritime, freight and canals—your predecessor, Fran Pacitti. Transport Scotland used the word “authorised” in relation to CMAL being able
“to enter into the Contracts and any associated documentation.”
At the bottom of that letter, it says:
“I confirm that the Scottish Ministers have considered and approved the contents of this letter.”
One of the issues that are at stake is whether written authority from ministers was sought and secured but not recorded or whether the correspondence does not constitute that at all. Mr Brannen, will you address that point?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
Okay, but in light of the view of CMAL, which also reports directly to the ministerial team, why do you not think that it was asking for written authority?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Richard Leonard
My final question, Roy Brannen, is to ask whether it was in your gift to advise ministers to terminate the contract. If it was, did it cross your mind to do that?