Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 6 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3464 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Richard Leonard

For the record, what is your understanding of the reasons for the departure of the chair of the board of management or the principal and chief executive, for example? Were those reasons related to issues that are raised in the report?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Richard Leonard

I am sorry—it was February 2023.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Richard Leonard

I turn to Colin Beattie, who has some questions to put to you.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Richard Leonard

I invite Graham Simpson to continue the line of questioning.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Richard Leonard

We will return to the point about delays. It is evident from your report that there were issues going back to 2020, with contracts not having been signed off or not existing at all. You have already mentioned that the procurement breach was identified in November 2022. The issues that have been identified are fairly old. Here we are in 2025 and, perhaps not surprisingly, some of the people who were involved in 2020 and 2022 are no longer there. That is problematic, and it is one of the results of having such a delayed process.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Richard Leonard

However, one of the changes in posts is related to the findings of the audit and the issues that are discussed in your report: the departure of the project director—the director of strategic partnerships and regional economy. At one point, she had oversight of the project and then, at another point, she formed a company with the external consultant in which she became a co-shareholder and co-director with that external consultant, while still being an employee of the college. Does that not suggest to you a conflict of interest?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Decision on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Richard Leonard

Good morning, and welcome to the 18th meeting in 2025 of the Public Audit Committee. We have apologies from the deputy convener, Jamie Greene.

Under agenda item 1, does the committee agree to take agenda items 3, 4 and 5 in private?

Members indicated agreement.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Richard Leonard

Before I bring in Graham Simpson, I want to turn to something else. We are not the police; we are the Public Audit Committee, but we can reflect on some of the evidence that was presented to an employment tribunal in an unfair dismissal claim by the former project director, which was convened in June 2024.

In paragraph 29 of your report, you say—you also said it in your opening statement—that it was

“clear there was a mismanagement of funds”.

You say that that is why the police chose not to proceed. However, the evidence that was captured in the employment tribunal’s extended reasons referred to an internal audit. As it was an audit, it very much has provenance, and it is right for the committee, and you as the Auditor General, to address the points that it raised.

The internal audit, which reported on 31 May 2023, raised two quite striking points, which, in my view, go beyond the mismanagement of funds, because it concluded that there were

“false representations by words, or writing or conduct”.

It also said that

“the intention to deceive was established.”

The audit said that there was “no financial loss”, so there was, technically speaking, no fraud, but an “intention to deceive” and “false representations” are extremely damning conclusions to reach in an internal audit report, are they not?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Richard Leonard

Paragraph 30 of the section 22 report makes the point that the external consultant appeared to be “managing the project director”. You would expect it to be the other way round and that the project director at the college would manage and direct the consultant. That is quite extraordinary, is it not?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2022/23 audit of Forth Valley College”

Meeting date: 4 June 2025

Richard Leonard

There are big questions about transparency, and why there are so many big questions about it is what underlies the committee’s concern.

At the end of the report, you take us into the terrain of accounts directions from the Scottish Funding Council on something that the committee has previously taken evidence on—the job evaluation process for non-teaching grades, although I think that you mentioned middle management as well as other jobs in the college sector. The committee’s question is why that is included in the report.