The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3287 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Richard Leonard
Again, that seems to be rather at odds with the conclusion that was drawn by Audit Scotland that Transport Scotland had some oversight responsibility for the procurement process. Last time, we heard the mantra from Mr Brannen that it was all about buyer and builder, but this is public money. As an accountable officer, do you not have some accountability for how that money is spent?
09:30Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Richard Leonard
I will put to you a final point, which relates to whether the First Minister was involved, whether through a special adviser or directly or indirectly. In his evidence last time, Mr Brannen was quite clear—it is a pity that he is not here today—that there was no involvement whatsoever of the First Minister, and we accept him at his word. If that is the case, will you give us your understanding of why, when the First Minister was questioned on 29 March by Glenn Campbell of the BBC about whether it was on her say so, and he asked her,
“Did you say ‘go ahead’?”,
her reply was,
“I didn’t say don’t go ahead”?
Why would she not just give an unequivocal Roy Brannen answer and say, “No, I was not involved”?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Richard Leonard
I thank Willie Coffey for his questions. I turn to Craig Hoy, who will pick up on the same theme, so Mo Rooney might be able to come in in response to his questions.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Richard Leonard
I have a couple of final questions before the evidence session ends, which go back to our previous evidence session with Transport Scotland. I think that Fran Pacitti addressed the issue at the time, and I am interested in hearing Hugh Gillies’s view. We were told that all port, harbour and ferry infrastructure projects now go through the investment decision-making board at Transport Scotland. Back in 2015, what was the value threshold that meant that the two vessels did not go through that process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Richard Leonard
Do you expect that he was talking about financial issues, procurement issues, things that might have been subject to challenge or political issues? What do you think?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Richard Leonard
Willie Coffey, as I mentioned at the start of the meeting, joins us via videolink. He has a number of questions on nationalisation.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Richard Leonard
Thank you, Mr Cook. I am conscious of the fact that Mr Gillies is an accountable officer. It might be that we will go directly to Mr Gillies on some of our areas of questioning.
First of all, I invite the deputy convener, Sharon Dowey, to put some questions to you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Richard Leonard
While we are on the subject of documentary evidence, at our meeting on 26 May, there was some discussion about what Mr Brannen kept referring to as “the bit of paper”. In his evidence, he said:
“with further investigation by Fran Pacitti and the records team it”—
the paperwork—
“turned up … I accept that, on that occasion, that one bit of paper was not easy to find, but we did find it … Now that we have the bit of paper that explains that the minister accepted that, that is the totality of that exchange.”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 26 May 2022; c 7, 8.]
Fran Pacitti, what were you asked to look for and who asked you to look for it?
09:15Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Richard Leonard
Do you think that that is what you found?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 9 June 2022
Richard Leonard
That is not the view of Audit Scotland. Even after the discovery of 11 May and the publication that you were able to make, Audit Scotland said:
“The email confirms that ministers approved the award of the FMEL contract. But there remains insufficient documentary evidence to explain why the decision was made to proceed with the contract, given the significant risks and concerns raised by CMAL.”
Notwithstanding what you have said, Audit Scotland’s view is quite different, is it not?