Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 15 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3340 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 8 September 2022

Richard Leonard

So you are saying that the transfer of risk from FMEL to CMAL and then to the Scottish Government would have been taken by officials, with no political sign-off.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 8 September 2022

Richard Leonard

Okay. We might investigate that matter a bit more deeply.

I turn to Willie Coffey.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 8 September 2022

Richard Leonard

Colin Beattie has some questions.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 8 September 2022

Richard Leonard

Will you briefly touch on nationalisation, Colin? I will then bring in Graham Simpson.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 8 September 2022

Richard Leonard

In the minutes that are remaining, I want to bring in Craig Hoy briefly, and then I will ask Graham Simpson whether he has a question to put to Mr Mackay.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Richard Leonard

I am anxious to bring Willie Coffey in. There are only 60 minutes in this hour, so I am afraid that I will have to cut you off at that point, Colin. If we have time, I will you bring back in, but I want to bring in Willie Coffey, who has a series of questions to ask.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Richard Leonard

I have a final question for Mr Østergaard. In your opinion, given your experience, do you think that the ferries will be fit for purpose?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Richard Leonard

My understanding is that CalMac cannot refuse the ferries, for example; it will be required to operate them. We have received evidence from people that suggests that there will be problems because of the length of time that it has taken to build the vessels. You do not see that.

Public Audit Committee

Major Capital Projects

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Richard Leonard

Thank you very much indeed, Bill. I should have declared my interest as the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers parliamentary convener. In that capacity, I might dispute some of your views about the settled patterns as they will be in the future compared to coming out of the pandemic.

Willie Coffey is trying his best to get in, and I am going to give him the last word before I conclude the meeting.

Public Audit Committee

Major Capital Projects

Meeting date: 30 June 2022

Richard Leonard

This morning we are primarily concentrating on transport projects, especially road and rail. Again for my information, could you explain a bit more about the targeted review of the capital spending review, which sounds to me like a review of a review? What is that comprised of? How are priorities are set and allocations awarded at the end of that?