The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3298 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Were they rejected?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Which of the 13 steps did they get to?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. Those are all the questions that I have in that area for now.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Yes—this is my chosen specialist subject.
Last week, we had three commissions in front of us, or rather, two commissions—the Scottish Fiscal Commission and the Mental Welfare Commission Scotland—and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland. We learned from their evidence that two of them are separately audited by Audit Scotland and/or by their appointed auditors, but one is part of the audit that is conducted into the Scottish Government’s consolidated accounts.
Could you or your officials explain how it is determined whether a body is subsumed into the overall audit of the Scottish Government or is audited as a separate body?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Let me ask about oversight by the Scottish Government—either by the sponsor team or whichever part of the Government is relevant. What is the difference between, say, oversight of the audit of His Majesty’s inspectorates versus the oversight of the audit of the Scottish Fiscal Commission or the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
As I have said, a view has come through that, just as HM Inspectorate of Constabulary is part of a collective audit—in that it is part of the Scottish Government audit—some of the bodies that we are looking at could be a subject within the Parliament’s internal audit instead of being separately audited. I am not advocating for that to happen; I am just reflecting on evidence that we have taken as a committee.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay, right; thank you. I now invite Stuart McMillan to put some final questions to you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I will bookend the session by returning to the recommendations. Laura Caven seemed to hesitate a bit in saying whether she accepts the recommendation on having more consistent data nationally, which has been a theme of this morning’s meeting and in the Audit Scotland and Accounts Commission briefing and recommendations.
When Stella Smith was answering one of the questions that Graham Simpson put to her, I was reflecting on the fact that, as well as recommendations, the briefing has suggested timescales for meeting those recommendations. Do you accept the timescales that the Auditor General and Accounts Commission recommend?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That almost takes us to a full two hours. I place on record the thanks of the committee for your time and input. I thank Joanna Anderson—I apologise that your name was misspelled on your nameplate, Joanna—Suzanne McLeod and Laura Caven from COSLA, and I thank Clair Henderson, Stella Smith and Neil Rennick from the Scottish Government.
With that, I move the committee into private session.
11:29 Meeting continued in private until 12:43.Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Richard Leonard
We will get into more detail on this, and I will bring in Colin Beattie in short order, but I just want to be clear on one point. One of the fundamental criticisms that is levelled at the Scottish Government and, I guess, COSLA in the briefing is about the gaps in data. In order to plan, you need evidence, and you need to be able to follow that evidence and to make sure that the resources are being used in the right way.
I presume that data collection, which we will get into in some detail, is entirely within your gift. You could produce data in a way that is consistent across local authorities, which would allow you to form a national picture and understand where the £8 billion-worth of public spending in education services ought to go.