The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3298 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
I will turn to the other end of the scale and ask about one of your below-threshold investments, which was in a construction company that is building houses in Shetland for key workers, to try to address the housing shortage. The report about that enterprise mentions that it is in the process of converting to be—it may already now be—employee owned. On the point about ownership structure, what the company looks like, its governance and so on, was that a positive additional reason for making the investment?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Is it fair for me to take from those answers that the employee ownership element did not play much of a part in the decision to invest?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Excellent. That is a very positive point.
I have one other question, and a couple of other members have quick final questions. My question goes back to the Audit Scotland report and its recommendation—which Mr Watt referred to at the very beginning of the meeting—that the bank should
“set out more clearly how it reaches specific investment decisions and the factors that have influenced its choice of investment.”
You have rehearsed that issue extensively during the course of this morning, not least in the answer that you have just given. How do you plan to go about doing that? How do you plan to be a bit more transparent than you have been?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
That is great. Graham Simpson has a quick final question.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
When the investment was announced, one eye-catching thing that we were told was that 60 per cent of it would be in Scotland, and the corollary of that is that 40 per cent would not be. Why is the Scottish National Investment Bank putting money into a fund that is not investing in Scotland?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you. On that final point, for the record, does the bank accept all of the report’s findings, and is it prepared to follow up on all the recommendations that are targeted at the bank?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
We are not the Public Audit Committee for Connecticut, fortunately.
We will have one final and brief question from the deputy convener, before we wrap it up.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
I have a couple of final questions to put to you. I will begin by tidying up a couple of issues that arose in the previous round of questions.
In response to the questions on remuneration arrangements, you mentioned that the remuneration committee had approved the long-term incentive plan and the mission contribution reward scheme. I presume that that also requires ministerial sign-off. Is that correct?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
Arguably, Mr Watt—I have found that the Treasury is not always right.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Richard Leonard
It might be easier to change the law than it is to change the mind of the Treasury. [Laughter.]