Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 12 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3298 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee

“Criminal courts backlog”

Meeting date: 8 June 2023

Richard Leonard

Thank you; that statement set the scene very well. You mention at the start of the report that you have a plan to monitor progress against the report’s recommendations. Can you tell us a little bit more about how you plan to do that monitoring work?

Public Audit Committee

“Criminal courts backlog”

Meeting date: 8 June 2023

Richard Leonard

Thank you. I turn to Willie Coffey, who has more questions on the Covid response.

Public Audit Committee

“Criminal courts backlog”

Meeting date: 8 June 2023

Richard Leonard

We see a lot of your reports and I thought that it was interesting that your recommendations in this one are aligned with timetables. You have got things that you expect to happen within three to six months, over the next 12 months and then over the next 12 to 18 months, and I think that that is a useful way of addressing some of the challenges that you have identified. It seems to me to be quite innovative and very useful.

Have you agreed those timescales with the Scottish Government and the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service?

Public Audit Committee

Decision on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 8 June 2023

Richard Leonard

Good morning. Welcome to the 17th meeting of the Public Audit Committee in 2023. We have apologies from Colin Beattie.

The first item on our agenda is to agree—or not—to take agenda items 3, 4 and 5 in private. Do we agree to do so?

Members indicated agreement.

Public Audit Committee

“Criminal courts backlog”

Meeting date: 8 June 2023

Richard Leonard

I will bring Willie Coffey back in now because he has more questions about some of the innovations that were developed during the course of the pandemic.

Public Audit Committee

“Criminal courts backlog”

Meeting date: 8 June 2023

Richard Leonard

One of the issues that you have alluded to, and which jumped out at me from the report, was what you describe as a failure to consistently apply equality impact assessments. You have mentioned the recover, renew, transform advisory group, which I think you said included organisations such as Rape Crisis Scotland and Victim Support Scotland. Why were they not involved in equality impact assessment work? Was such work simply not carried out at all?

Public Audit Committee

“Criminal courts backlog”

Meeting date: 8 June 2023

Richard Leonard

Earlier, we spoke about the prioritisation of cases. When the number of hub courts went from 39 to 10, some prioritisation had to be exercised. Was there no equalities impact assessment, or was no equalities sieve applied to the prioritisation work at that point?

Public Audit Committee

“Criminal courts backlog”

Meeting date: 8 June 2023

Richard Leonard

Do you get a sense that that aspect is now factored in and that it will become much more of a feature of the work that is carried out?

Public Audit Committee

“Criminal courts backlog”

Meeting date: 8 June 2023

Richard Leonard

In the report, you mention other weaknesses over and above the failure to carry out equality impact assessments. You set those out in paragraph 83. Again, they stand out as areas of significant concern. You say that the Scottish Government and the criminal justice board

“did not agree clear plans, outcomes and success measures”

for the recover, renew, transform programme; that

“the RRT advisory group was not given the opportunity to be sufficiently engaged”

in that programme; and that the advisory group did not seem to get full access to decision making.

You also say that

“wider public reporting of the programme was limited”;

that there was inconsistency; that minutes of the criminal justice board meetings were not produced; and that the results of a lessons-learned exercise appear not to have been adopted.

We would expect such rudimentary elements of operation to be met but, according to your report and findings, that was simply not the case. Will you elaborate a bit more on why that was?

Public Audit Committee

“Criminal courts backlog”

Meeting date: 8 June 2023

Richard Leonard

Has work begun on addressing those weaknesses?