The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3298 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Are there not?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. So, you think that that is a robust system and you do not think that any body is in the wrong category for auditing purposes.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I know that Mr Macleod will be familiar with the recent incident involving the Water Industry Commission for Scotland. It is quite a small organisation, and clearly at arm’s length from Government, but it has been the subject of section 22 reports by Audit Scotland because of issues of governance, expenditure and so on. If an internal part of the Scottish Government had similar issues, how would they be addressed?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That is fine.
A theme that has been highlighted to us, especially by the SPCB-supported commissioners, is a feeling that the level of audit to which they are subject is overly burdensome and disproportionate to the size of their organisations and the functions that they perform. In asking this question, minister, I am looking not just at you but at your team. Have you picked up a similar feeling from the supported bodies for which the Scottish Government is responsible?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That is step 6. [Laughter.]
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I will start with the final area that you were talking about, which is the public sector reform agenda, but also place it in the context of the ministerial control framework. Have you undertaken a mapping exercise to consider where different functions sit among the 131 public bodies that are covered by the Scottish Government?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Well, to see whether there is duplication or overlap.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
My question as a member of this committee, however, is whether you have carried out any kind of assessment of whether there is an overlap or duplication when it comes to the purposes of the different public bodies.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
It is not just about whether you can share IT or HR systems; it is also about whether two bodies are, in part, doing coincidental work or have a coincidental purpose.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
My final question, just for completeness, is this: are you looking at the proportionality of the audit process as part of your assessment of public service reform and whether the landscape is fit for purpose?