The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3298 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Richard Leonard
I will come on to ask about the focus groups in a second. Before I do so, I note that paragraph 15 in the report sets out the scale of the challenge that we face. It talks about what appear to be almost epidemic proportions, in that 22 per cent of the adult population
“may have a psychiatric disorder”.
You talk about the huge expansion in pressure and demand on services. For example,
“The number of police incidents relating to mental health increased by 62 per cent ...The Scottish Association for Mental Health ... reported a 50 per cent increase in demand for its information service”
and
“The number of calls to NHS 24’s 111 Mental Health Hub increased by 436 per cent”.
Those are startling figures, which are presumably placing huge pressure on the system. We might not have measured the outcomes, but we know something about the scale of the demand that there is.
Do you want to tell us a bit more about the qualitative information that you got from the focus groups that you met and what that told you about their experience?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Richard Leonard
Okay, but is it therefore possible that that spend was deprioritised?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Richard Leonard
Thank you. That is a theme that we will return to during the course of the morning. I turn to Colin Beattie, who has some questions to put to you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Richard Leonard
I am afraid that I am going to bring us back to the institutional architecture and all that. One of the things that I take from the report is the question of where the IJBs are in all of this. There is a lot of attention on the health boards’ outcomes and the local authorities’ outcomes, but the IJBs are supposed to straddle the work of those bodies and to pull it together and integrate it. Will you say a word or two about the conclusions that you drew from the work that you did on the role of the IJBs?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Richard Leonard
I think that IJBs were described in Parliament just last week as being quite a mixed bag. I do not know whether you have discerned this from your auditing work, but is it the case that, in some areas, the IJBs are accountable and are working well, whereas in others they are not? You do not need to name any, but do you get the sense that there are different performances in different parts of the country?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2023
Richard Leonard
We are very tight for time. Graham Simpson, you can have the final question, if it is very quick.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2023
Richard Leonard
Do you accept that no minute of that was produced or found?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2023
Richard Leonard
The former First Minister said to us:
“Officials have been unable to locate a note of this meeting”.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2023
Richard Leonard
Okay. I know that Mr Brannen was absolutely clear about pinning responsibility on Mr Mackay. As a committee, our observation was that, at the time of the decision, there appeared to be more hands on the tiller than just Mr Mackay’s. As you say, minister, we know that it was not a ministerial name on the contract, but it did require ministerial authorisation, which makes it important to us to understand who was responsible.
As I say, we are interested to find out what lessons have been learned from that and how we can get more clarity on what was actually a very important decision and one that has become more important with hindsight, as things have progressed.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 September 2023
Richard Leonard
Well, the Government was the only shareholder involved. Anyway, that would be helpful.
I will turn finally to Graham Simpson, who has some more questions to put.