The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3464 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Richard Leonard
No, that is your prerogative.
I will go back to an earlier line of questioning. There is something that I want to understand. I have correspondence in front of me from 2018 when the then Public Audit and Post-Legislative Scrutiny Committee wrote to the then Minister for Further Education, Higher Education and Science to seek clarity about the respective role of the Government, the Scottish Funding Council and the colleges. In the minister’s reply, one of the turns of phrase that were used in reference to the financial memorandum at the time struck me. The letter said:
“Importantly, the FM”—
the financial memorandum—
“recognises that colleges are autonomous bodies”.
What happens if a college runs out of money before the end of the year? I think that Karen Watt said that the Scottish Funding Council is in a much tougher financial position and that it maybe does not have the strategic funds that it would have had a few years ago to help a college to get over that. What would happen? Would the college become technically insolvent?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Richard Leonard
The question of the infrastructure of the college estate has been an issue for quite some time. I think that the Auditor General brought out a report on it in 2018, and I certainly remember raising it in Parliament with the then First Minister as a matter of public interest and concern. Why has it taken so long to address the issue?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Richard Leonard
Graham Simpson has a very short question.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Richard Leonard
Thank you very much, indeed.
One of the themes that we will pick up this morning is financial sustainability. By way of opening up on that, I note that the evidence that we have taken—both from the Auditor General and from witnesses at a round-table meeting to which we invited the key stakeholders in the sector to give us their perspectives—put across some fairly clear points.
The Audit Scotland report identifies that 8.5 per cent of real-terms cuts have been imposed on the sector over the past two years. A pre-budget submission from Colleges Scotland described the sector as being “on a burning platform”—echoing the words that James Withers had used.
Colleges Scotland’s post-budget analysis suggests that, in its view, revenue funding for Scotland’s colleges is to be cut by 8.4 per cent year on year—in cash terms, not in real terms. It is estimated that the capital budget will rise by 3 per cent in cash terms.
Karen Watt’s note to the committee says that
“The financial position of colleges continues to deteriorate”.
What is the financial position of colleges, Mr Rennick?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Richard Leonard
You also spoke of financial challenges. We will get to those in more detail in the course of the meeting, but I have a question about the announcement in the past couple of weeks of another in-year budget cut to mental health services, which follows on from the in-year cut announced as a result of the emergency budget review last November, which was of the order of £38 million. The cut this year is £29.9 million.
The joint report states:
“Increasing the availability of mental health and wellbeing services in primary care could help to prioritise prevention and early intervention and decrease pressure on specialist services.”
How will the recently announced cuts, which include a reprofiling of mental health and primary care programmes, impact on those services?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Richard Leonard
So, what spend has been postponed—I think that that was the expression used in the letter to the Finance and Public Administration Committee—from the mental health transformation fund?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Richard Leonard
Is there not a bit of an implementation gap? The Government’s stated position is that it will increase mental health funding by 25 per cent and that 10 per cent of all NHS front-line spending will be on mental health, but things seem to be going backwards, not forwards, on both fronts.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Richard Leonard
We will get on to data and evidence shortly.
One of the clear recommendations of the report that we are discussing concerns the fact that there is a great inequality in the impact of mental ill health. In one of the evidence sessions, we considered the impact on the minority ethnic community and other marginalised groups. Will taking money out of the mental health services budget not also have a disproportionately unequal impact on the communities that are most marginalised and probably most dependent on mental health services?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Richard Leonard
There is a joint Convention of Scottish Local Authorities-Scottish Government mental health and wellbeing strategy that refers to the specific needs of minority ethnic groups. However, during the course of our inquires, we have been told that there is no action in the accompanying delivery plan to provide culturally sensitive mental health services. Can you explain why that is?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2023
Richard Leonard
Those groups have said to us that a plan does not exist.