The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3464 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Richard Leonard
Thank you for that helpful introductory statement. One of the chapters in the briefing is headed “Reporting progress and measuring success”, so I want to begin by asking for a report on progress and whether success was measured in terms of the previous national economic strategy, which was launched in 2015. At paragraph 4 of the briefing, you mention that the two principal objectives of that strategy were
“boosting competitiveness and tackling inequality.”
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Richard Leonard
We will see whether the new vision is easier to translate into tangible, measurable actions.
This might not be an area for you to comment on, but I would be interested to hear any view that you may have. The previous strategy was formulated and launched in 2015. In 2016 we had a referendum on membership of the European Union, and the UK overall voted for us to leave. As a consequence, the UK left the European Union in January 2020. I am a bit surprised that there has been no revision to the strategy in light of such a significant event.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Richard Leonard
Other people will come on to some of those areas later, in particular the governance arrangements.
Before I hand over to the deputy convener I will return to the importance of transparency and clarity around the goals and action points. I looked at exhibit 1 in your briefing, headed “Examples of NSET actions”, and I noted the actions under the national strategy for economic transformation that you listed. The first one is:
“Create a national system of pre-scaler hubs that will stimulate the very earliest stages of high growth commercial and social entrepreneurship.”
The next one that is cited is:
“Build strategic partnerships with other key entrepreneurial ecosystems in other countries.”
The third is:
“Design and implement programmes on practical actions business and leaders can take to boost productivity at scale.”
There is an awful lot of jargon there for something that I presume is meant to be a public document that people can read in order to understand the intent of the economic strategy.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Richard Leonard
Thank you. I invite Jamie Greene to put questions to the Auditor General.
10:15Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Richard Leonard
I do not think that the committee needs examples of Scottish National Investment Bank portfolio investments; we can look those up elsewhere.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Richard Leonard
About 15 minutes at the most.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Richard Leonard
The principal item on our agenda this morning is an evidence-taking session on the Auditor General for Scotland’s briefing paper, “Investing in Scotland’s infrastructure”. I welcome our witnesses, who have joined us in the committee room.
I am pleased to say that we are joined by the director general of the Scottish exchequer, Alyson Stafford. Alongside her are witnesses from the Scottish Government: Morag Angus, chief surveyor; Dr Alison Cumming, director of budget and public spending; and Alan Morrison, deputy director of health infrastructure, investment and personal protective equipment. We are also joined by Alison Irvine, interim chief executive, Transport Scotland, and Peter Reekie, chief executive, Scottish Futures Trust.
In light of the timetabling this morning, we have agreed that there will be no opening statement and that we will go straight to questions. I will begin by asking the director general of the Scottish exchequer a straightforward question: is there any change to the Scottish Government’s capital allocation following yesterday’s budget statement?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Richard Leonard
Okay. Is that a reduction in the block grant figure? Changes are also projected to be made in the financial transactions sums that you get, are they not?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Richard Leonard
This is almost a technical question, but why, in projecting forward, can you have with any certainty a sense of what the figure for a real-terms cut will be? We do not know what inflation will be in two months’ time, never mind two years’ time, do we?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2024
Richard Leonard
Thank you. My colleagues might have further questions on the subject of yesterday’s budget statement, but I now turn to the Auditor General’s report. I also want to take into account a letter that you sent to the committee on 29 January in which you addressed some of the points raised in our evidence session with the Auditor General.
One of the recommendations that the Auditor General made was on the extent to which you provide “clear and regular information” and the extent to which that information bears out whether it supports “wider governmental goals”. He also commented on improving reporting on “individual projects and programmes” to better highlight cost overruns and/or delays. Will you update the committee on where you are in responding to the recommendations?