The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3042 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Richard Leonard
I will go back to the regulator and advocacy distinction. Do you see yourself as having a regulatory role?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Richard Leonard
That is interesting.
I know that this question is probably invidious, too, but could you put figures on that split? Is it now 80:20 or 50:50?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Good morning. I want to pick up the points about powers, which you might be able to help me with. As I understand it, you have investigatory powers in relation to the human rights of groups of children. You now also have investigatory powers in relation to human rights in individual cases. You said that the prosecution of individual cases rests with the SPSO, but, when the SPSO came to see the committee, she explained that the office has no enforcement powers. It can make recommendations to public bodies—even to the Parliament and to Governments—but there is no binding requirement for its recommendations to be followed. Is that the model that you want?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Richard Leonard
That distinction is well made.
The other question that I want to put to you, which, again, is one that I put earlier to the Scottish Human Rights Commission, is about shared services. From your perspective, are there obvious barriers that are preventing greater sharing of services between the various SPCB supported bodies?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay—thank you very much.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you. That was very clear and helpful.
There are other labels that get bandied about, such as the extent to which you are “proactive” or “reactive”; indeed, we have used those terms ourselves earlier, and you have answered Lorna Slater’s question on that point. This might seem invidious, but could you put percentages on the balance of your workload between proactive and reactive activities?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Richard Leonard
That was a very helpful answer. Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Richard Leonard
Imagine it, Mr Hobbs. Would you like them?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Richard Leonard
That is the collective view of the commissioner and the office.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2025
Richard Leonard
That is helpful. One of the things that we are asking every witness who appears before the committee relates to the distinction that is drawn between being a regulator and being an advocate. People say to me that the Children and Young People’s Commissioner is an advocacy commission. How do you define yourself?