The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3214 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you for that outline. I will go straight to Graham Simpson, who will open the questions.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I am obviously interested in that aspect of reform as convener of the Public Audit Committee.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Last week, His Majesty’s chief inspector of constabulary in Scotland talked to the committee about some collaborative work that he is doing with Audit Scotland, on a best value audit of Police Scotland, so there are good examples of such synergies.
Let me move from the existing landscape to the process. As I read it, you have a 13-step process in the ministerial control framework to assess whether a new body is warranted. The mantra underpinning that is that
“any new public body should only be set up as a last resort.”
What does that mean in practice?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
The framework was introduced exactly two years ago, in May 2023. In those two years, how many new public bodies have been created?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That would be helpful.
One of the steps—I think that it is step 11—refers to occasions on which ministerial written authority might be required. In other words, the civil service’s assessment is presumably that the proposal does not represent efficiency, effectiveness or economy, but, nonetheless, there is a political imperative to create the new body or position. Are there any examples of cases in which such authority has been required?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Are there not?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
Okay. So, you think that that is a robust system and you do not think that any body is in the wrong category for auditing purposes.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
I know that Mr Macleod will be familiar with the recent incident involving the Water Industry Commission for Scotland. It is quite a small organisation, and clearly at arm’s length from Government, but it has been the subject of section 22 reports by Audit Scotland because of issues of governance, expenditure and so on. If an internal part of the Scottish Government had similar issues, how would they be addressed?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Richard Leonard
That is fine.
A theme that has been highlighted to us, especially by the SPCB-supported commissioners, is a feeling that the level of audit to which they are subject is overly burdensome and disproportionate to the size of their organisations and the functions that they perform. In asking this question, minister, I am looking not just at you but at your team. Have you picked up a similar feeling from the supported bodies for which the Scottish Government is responsible?