The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3268 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
The question for the member who has introduced the bill is whether she is looking at 32 registers that feed into one central database. How would that work? How would they speak to one another? You could be travelling from one local authority area to another to buy a dog—most people do, because they go to where the dog that they want to purchase is. You would want all those databases to speak to one another.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
Because that is not in the bill, it is not something that I have necessarily an answer to—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
I will finish my response. If that had been put into the bill, we could have addressed it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
That is a key question. As I was listening to it, I was thinking about two things. On the one hand—as with quite a lot of this bill—the responsible people will sign up, but the question is: how can we find the people who do not? I do not know—it is impossible.
The other unintended consequence is that if people think that there might be penalties associated with not registering, they might not seek veterinary assistance. What if a household gets caught out and finds itself with a litter? They might want to move the litter on to people whom they know, advertise or whatever, but they might also be worried about the expense of everything else involved. If they cannot afford that, they might worry that, when they take the puppies to the vet for a check-up, the vet might phone the council to say that they are not registered.
It is a complex issue. We have to take into account the fact that we are not talking about people who are breeding for an income; after all, having up to two litters is not a business. We are probably talking about families who are going through a once or twice-in-a-lifetime experience. They might want to let their dog have a litter and to sell the puppies to people in their community whom they might know. Should they then have to do this onerous task? Perhaps I should take away the word “onerous”, as Christine Grahame is not suggesting anything onerous, but what does it really achieve?
The other question that I keep coming back to is this: does being on a register give some kind of false legitimacy to the welfare issues around puppies? That is a worry, too.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
I could not have put it better.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
I do not really know what to say to that. Are you expecting members of the public to phone up and identify neighbours with a litter of puppies?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
Convener, that is a statement rather than a question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Gillian Martin
I might bring in my officials in a second because, as I said, they have been working on the bill for some time.
The language around use and sale is much cleaner and clearer. My officials will comment on the rationale, on which they have been working for some time, but we could have a situation in which someone could have old glue traps in a garden shed or loft. We should not criminalise people who do not intend to use such traps but who bought them a long time ago and might not even know that they still have them.
We will stop the sale and use of glue traps. My officials will be able to give you the detail of the investigation into that aspect of the bill, but my feeling is that introducing an offence of possession could unnecessarily criminalise people who have just forgotten that they have traps. Police Scotland will be involved in disposal of any glue traps that people have, so I guess that it will do some work to ensure that people do not possess them when they should not. However, I do not see the need to criminalise people who do not intend to use glue traps.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Gillian Martin
I get where you are going, Mr Allan: obviously, there is sale of recognised brands of glue trap, but someone could make a home-made version.
Hugh Dignon is helpfully pointing out that the bill states:
“‘glue trap’ means a trap that ... is designed, or is capable of being used, to catch an animal other than an invertebrate, and ... uses an adhesive substance as the means, or one of the means, of capture.”
Therefore, the home-made version that you mentioned would be a glue trap. Basically, the provision would include that. We are not in a situation where planks of wood and tins of glue—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Gillian Martin
We have not decided on that yet.