The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3268 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
I need to give that some more thought, because I had not really appreciated it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
That just goes to show how effective it was.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
It is a reasonable question, but I do not have that information in front of me.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
Again, that is really a question for Ms Grahame, as she has come up with those figures. However, we have looked at them and they seem to be in line with figures for other campaigns of that sort. I imagine that the estimated cost—I cannot remember whether it is £200,000 or £250,000—takes into account the cost of the staffing associated with such a campaign and the materials involved. Given that those materials will probably be digital, we are talking mainly about staffing and creative costs.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
That is why I am very supportive of part 1 of the bill, because it is about education.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
That is why I am supportive of the general principles of your bill. What is absolutely required is enhanced advice that could be given to people well ahead of having a puppy or a dog in their homes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
I believe that tweaks are required to that part of the bill that would give real flexibility in the code of practice for unforeseen developments in that area and I am not entirely sure why Ms Grahame would not want that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
I probably have a copy of that in all the briefings that I have gone through in the past couple of days, Ms Grahame. Am I going to be tested on it?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
That could be your recommendation, convener. The committee will have to discuss how it views Ms Grahame’s bill and put all those questions to her when she comes before you. You will be reporting on the bill, and we will have a debate, at stage 1, and that could be the committee’s view.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 October 2023
Gillian Martin
My understanding is that the updating and everything else to do with the register would fall to the local authority. I have in front of me the estimated costs. The cost of setting up the register is estimated to be about £20,000—I presume that that is for every local authority to set up a database—and the maintenance of that is estimated to cost about £16,000 a year. I see that as only part of the costs—there would also be the cost of enforcement in relation to people registering.
There is another issue to consider. I worry that being on a register would almost act as a false kite mark for the puppies and the breeder. It does not have much in the way of responsibilities associated with it. It does not come with any of the conditions that licensed breeders have to meet, around inspection and other animal welfare concerns.
10:00Going back to our concerns about the individuals and organisations that are involved in puppy trafficking, I worry that, if there is a public register, families with a dog might be targeted by those people as a front for their operations. We have already seen that sort of thing before with puppies being brought in from outwith Scotland or the UK; there have been cases of people renting, say, Airbnbs and finding a bitch there that is not, in fact, the mother of those puppies. People come to what they think is a family home, when it is not.
Potentially—this is just a niggle that I have—such a register could act almost as a kite mark type of front that would add legitimacy to something that was otherwise not legitimate. That is just a little worry that I have about this.