The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3234 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
I heard that mentioned.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
I am sorry if it took me a wee while to get there.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
I want to take the committee back in the bill to the first purpose of using this power, which is
“to maintain or advance standards in relation to ... restoring, enhancing or managing the natural environment ... preserving, protecting or restoring biodiversity”.
The bill says that the power can be used only in that area and in certain other areas, which I will not go through again—they are on the record. None of the purposes are about stripping out and removing environmental protections from an area that needs them. If an area needs those protections, the Government will not be allowed to strip them out, given that purpose in the bill.
I fundamentally disagree with the word “gut”—the bill will absolutely not give anyone the power to do that. In order to change the regulations, a Government would need to have legitimate reasons that were grounded in enhancing and managing the natural environment. The power is focused on improving biodiversity and managing the environment in a way that is nature positive; it is not about stripping, gutting or anything like that. As I said, maybe our communication on this has not been strong enough. That is the reason that the power is in the bill.
Last week, you heard from Brendan Callaghan of Scottish Forestry on that point. He said:
“If there is no power for ministers to amend regulations, any minor amendment has to be made through primary legislation. The opportunities for doing that are quite limited, given the parliamentary schedule”
and how long it takes to get legislation through. He said:
“It is about good administration.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 28 May 2025; c 37.]
It is about agility, responsiveness, working with changing conditions in a way that reacts to them and working with the data and the evidence that are put in front of us, so that it will not take years for us to take action.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
I am not quite sure how to answer that. The fact remains that the Scottish Government has responsibility for inshore areas and the UK Government has responsibility for offshore areas.
That exemplifies why it is important that the UK Government, as well as the Scottish Government, takes into account the net zero goals and the biodiversity goals. Interoperability between the four nations is extremely important, because biodiversity does not have boundaries—species do not have boundaries. We all have to work together to—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
When I was preparing for this, it was put to me that the simplest way to deal with this was to have a bespoke power for Scotland. If we do not have that, the standards and the legislation that we have, which are associated with EU legislation, will, in effect, be frozen at the time of the UK’s exit from the EU, and we will not be able to adapt beyond that. That is why we are looking to the bill to fill that gap. It means that we will be able to adapt to future circumstances and even to some present circumstances, many of which I outlined earlier.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
Good environmental status is a UK-wide endeavour, if that answers your question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
Yes. In my response to Emma Harper, I explained why such alignment could be very important. Obviously, we would want there to be alignment so that we do not have a gap. Guidance is, of course, not legally binding, but it is sensible to provide it if there is a gap. I will take advice from my official, who looks as though she might have something to add.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
Part 2 of the bill will give us flexibility around that and will bring it into line. It is agnostic about the technologies.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
You have sort of answered your own question in that the most likely circumstance in which the Scottish Government would need to consider secondary legislation would be to align with a UK environmental outcome report, and that would probably happen in relation to the marine environment. The UK Government has legislative competence in the Scottish offshore region, but the Scottish ministers have legislative competence in the Scottish inshore region, so there could be a need for alignment there.
As you said, it is important—especially for renewable energy developments—that there is consistency. There has to be a degree of interoperability. We do not want to be bound by a false boundary because of who has the power.
If two regimes have fundamentally different legal requirements, there might not be an option but to pursue legislative change. Again, that part of the bill is about future proofing, given that we do not know what developments will be on the table in the future. We want to be able to be responsive and to work with the UK Government to align on issues where a lack of alignment might be a barrier to any deployment, which we would not want to be the case.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
Let me take that away.