The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3061 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Gillian Martin
I will follow that up. Women who do not want to go to the NHS mesh removal service may have the option to choose a private provider. Where do you stand on helping women to do that? How will the pathway work?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Gillian Martin
We will move on to the reimbursement aspect of the bill, which is its main focus; it is about reimbursement for women who have had surgery privately or who have arranged surgery privately. We want to drill down into the eligibility criteria. Stephanie Callaghan will lead on that line of questioning.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Gillian Martin
Evelyn Tweed and I have questions about what reimbursement might cover and about proof of eligibility.
I am not clear about something. Suppose a woman had surgery involving mesh in Scotland but then opted to have the mesh removed privately when she was not resident in Scotland, although she might be resident in Scotland now. Am I correct in thinking that, if she was not resident in Scotland at the time of the mesh removal surgery, she would not be eligible for reimbursement of what she had paid?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Gillian Martin
So, if a person was not resident in Scotland at the time when they had mesh removal surgery, that is not included in the scheme.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Gillian Martin
Okay. We might dig into that later. Some members have questions on the financial memorandum, so it is good to have that point to dig into later.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Gillian Martin
How do you propose to make clear to the women who present the options that are available to them? The bill allows for patient choice. Women can opt to have their surgery in Scotland or in another part of the United Kingdom, and they can opt to have it done privately. How will the options be made clear to women? To what extent will the approach be patient centred and respect patients’ choices? How will all that be communicated, not just to patients but to general practitioners, given that we have heard from women that there is sometimes a lack of understanding on the part of GPs about mesh complications. Will you also cover that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Gillian Martin
If a person has applied for reimbursement and is not satisfied with the level of money that they have been given as a result of the application, what avenues might be open to them to challenge that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Gillian Martin
Welcome to the eighth meeting in 2021 of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee.
Our first item is to decide whether to take agenda items 3 to 6 in private. Do members agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Gillian Martin
Over the years, since Scottish Mesh Survivors first began petitioning, there has been a lot of testimony as to what happened to the women and where trust in the people who had been removing the mesh had dissolved. How has that informed the way in which the services are being taken forward? You talked about the clinicians and surgeons who are involved in the work that you are doing, and the expertise that you have. What learning has come from the mistakes and practices of the past to lead us to where we are now with the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Gillian Martin
We have heard from many women, and they have all said that there should be a degree of flexibility, because every person’s case, when they have gone for surgery—be it in Bristol or in the States—has been different. There have been different circumstances and, as Emma Harper has mentioned, women have had different health complications. They want to see that recognised and, if someone does not fit into a particular box but has still incurred a lot of costs, they want flexibility. Do you believe that the bill as it stands allows for that?