The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3343 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Gillian Martin
Can we get comments from a mental health perspective first?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Gillian Martin
Yes.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Gillian Martin
Stephanie Callaghan has indicated that she wants to ask a follow-up question.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Gillian Martin
The second agenda item is an evidence session with witnesses from the Scottish Government as part of our inquiry into the health and wellbeing of children and young people. I am delighted to welcome Kevin Stewart, the Minister for Mental Wellbeing and Social Care, and Maree Todd, the Minister for Public Health, Women’s Health and Sport. They are joined online by their officials: Angela Davidson, acting director for improving mental health and wellbeing; Mairi Macpherson, deputy director for improving health and wellbeing with the directorate for children and families; Stephen McLeod, national adviser for child and adolescent mental health services and neurodevelopmental services; and Carolyn Wilson, policy adviser for children and families. Welcome to the ministers and to you all.
Ms Todd, I believe that you would like to make an opening statement.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Gillian Martin
Stephanie Callaghan, Sue Webber, Sandesh Gulhane and Carol Mochan all want to ask questions about healthy weight and physical activity. I will bring in Stephanie Callaghan first.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Gillian Martin
Okay. I will bring in Sue Webber.
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Gillian Martin
Do you accept that safe drug consumption facilities might be a gateway for people to get treatment?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Gillian Martin
Thank you. I have run out of time—over to you, convener.
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Gillian Martin
Welcome to the meeting, Mr Malthouse. I come at this from my perspective as convener of the Scottish Parliament’s Health, Social Care and Sport Committee.
I have a very simple question. Do you agree that people who are addicted to drugs are unwell?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Gillian Martin
I am sorry to go on about this, but in response to recommendations from the Drug Deaths Taskforce, you said that safe consumption facilities might “condone drug use”. Does the very fact that you have said that straight off not show that, instead of your looking at them as a health intervention, you are opposed to such facilities because of an overriding concern that this is a case of public perception?