The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3584 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Gillian Martin
Wilful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Gillian Martin
It is covered by the vicarious liability provision, whereby someone
“commits the offence of ecocide, acting as the employee or agent of another”.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Gillian Martin
We feel satisfied that that is covered in the bill.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Gillian Martin
There could be a couple. It is important that the bill includes provision for permitted activities, so I will probably lodge stage 2 amendments to ensure that we allow for such activities. As it stands, the burden of proof is on the defence, which is not in line with the ECHR. I do not think that anyone meant that to be the case, but that could be an unintended consequence. Those are serious deficiencies in the bill as introduced, so I would want to rectify them at stage 2, and I suggest that others might want to do so, too.
I will leave it there. In my response to Ms Lennon, I have set out in a memorandum some of the unintended consequences that there could be as a result of the bill’s current drafting. In my mind, the ones that I have mentioned are the main ones.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Gillian Martin
Significant environmental harm would have been done, but it could not officially be said that they had been accused of and prosecuted for ecocide. If Ms Lennon’s bill were passed, people could be prosecuted for ecocide, because there would be an offence of ecocide.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Gillian Martin
It is distinct.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Gillian Martin
That is why we may want to link the two provisions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Gillian Martin
I might bring in the lawyer to answer that. Scots law adheres to the ECHR. The presumption of innocence means that it is up to the prosecution to prove a person’s guilt, not the other way round.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Gillian Martin
The committee has a copy of our policy memorandum, which outlines our main concerns and where we would like the bill to be amended at stage 2. If we become aware of any additional unintended consequences between now and stage 2—perhaps as a result of evidence and submissions that come in—we would want to address those as well.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Gillian Martin
Decisions on financing public bodies are taken during the budget process, and I am not going to talk about a budget that has not happened yet. A lot of bodies deal with environmental issues. An investigation of an ecocide event could involve Police Scotland, SEPA, NatureScot or the coastguard. The event could be marine, on land or whatever. It depends on the location and nature of the crime. In the case of a spill at sea, UK bodies could be involved. With an oil spill, non-Government spill response organisations could be involved. It is impossible for me to say what additional resource would be needed for an event that has not happened.