The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3266 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
That can be done by all the individual component parts of the UK working in concert with one another and having shared ambition. That is my answer to that. When we do not have shared ambition, that jeopardises the devolved Governments reaching their targets. For example, one of the biggest inhibitors to us meeting our net zero targets is the fact that the electricity that Scotland generates is too expensive for our citizens to use, so they cannot decarbonise. That is simply the nature of the situation that we are in as part of the UK.
However, we have regular interministerial meetings on all of that. I have regular meetings with my counterparts in Northern Ireland, Wales and the UK to discuss all those issues. If we take net zero as an example, the fundamental point is that the UK will not be able to meet its net zero target of 2050 without Scotland meeting its net zero target of 2045, and vice versa. Therefore, the four Governments must work in concert with one another.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
We will find out.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
I recognise that some stakeholders, and people who have given evidence to the committee, have expressed that there is potential for a narrow interpretation. I will take you through how the topics were arrived at. They were recommended in expert scientific advice that was provided by the biodiversity programme advisory group—for brevity, I will call it PAG from now on.
The group comprised a panel of experts and was chaired by the Government’s chief scientific adviser for environment, natural resources and agriculture. It advised on all three elements of the strategic framework for biodiversity, and the bill includes the group’s recommended topics for which we must have specific targets. The bill also contains the power to add other topics. What stakeholders say on that aspect is interesting, and it will be interesting to see, in future years, whether we require to add other topics.
On the particular topic that you mentioned, which is the status of threatened species, we felt that it was important that it was the status of species, not the rarity, that had to be considered. That effectively meant that it would cover more than just rare species, including species that are under threat now and those with declining populations, which might not be classified as rare but are under threat. We might be seeing a threat to their existence, or they might have restricted genetic diversity. They might be under threat because of impacts on their habitat or food chain. There might be impacts from other factors, such as has happened with avian influenza whereby pathogens have devastated particular species.
We wanted to ensure that we had—and PAG advised us to have—a broader definition, because we did not want to exclude certain species. We do not want species to get to the point at which they are rare; we want to be able to intervene at the point where we see threats to them. That is why there is a broader definition.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
I do not want to be prescriptive about particular actions. I want the bill to give us agility in the way in which we address issues, and I am absolutely open to scrutinising how the bill, as it is, could allow more targeted action. However, there are a number of provisions in the bill, particularly in part 2, that will allow us to be more fleet of foot in how we deal with emerging and changing issues. I can come on to this when we talk about part 2, but I included part 2 to give us that responsiveness and agility in a number of areas. That will mean that we do not need to wait for primary legislation to be able to deal with an emerging situation or a trend that we have identified and which needs attention quickly.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
A lot of the provisions in part 2 will allow us to do that. I am open to that because it is a real concern. We depend on quite a lot of volunteers to manage some areas, particularly our river banks. It may be that, in the associated action plans, local authorities need to pay more attention to things that are happening in the invasive species realm. However, I will not commit myself to anything. We can have a chat about that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
Yes, and it is about being responsive to changes in nature and better data collection, better evidence gathering and improvements in some of the technology that is associated with that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
There are already criteria associated with target setting. I will take you through that. The 2023 consultation was used throughout the development of targets. The criteria to be taken into account in the selection of targets are alignment with the Scottish biodiversity strategy high-level goals; alignment with the global biodiversity framework; alignment with European Union environmental standards, including those on nature restoration; and synergy with existing and forthcoming Scottish legislative frameworks and strategies.
I refer back to my point that targets do not exist in isolation but follow a lot of other policy development. We want to align with the global biodiversity framework and with European Union environmental standards. We are mindful that our targets have to galvanise cross-portfolio work across Government and cross-sectoral work across Scottish society, and they have to be measurable, achievable and realistic.
Those are the target-setting criteria that we have been using. Will we continue to develop the criteria? Yes. I come back to the words “agile” and “responsive”. I am not quite sure what Open Seas was thinking, but perhaps it has particular things in mind that it wishes to see as the criteria. I am, of course, happy to meet its representatives and those of any ENGOs about what those could be.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
This is where I need some legal advice. If it is okay, I will hand over to Stewart Cunningham, who has the detail on that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
—but it is an indicator. Look at the fish species that we do not see in the more southern Scottish waters but that we see in Ms Wishart’s constituency—things that we are finding in different parts of Scotland. That is an indication that climate change is real. If we have the flexibility that part 2 of the bill gives us, we will be able to respond to it in an agile way.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Gillian Martin
The targets are important in that regard. I mentioned to Beatrice Wishart the ability under the legislation for the targets to be changed, although they do not have to be reviewed every 10 years. Whether those targets are working or not, they are subject to parliamentary scrutiny—and, of course, there is all the reporting that is associated with the biodiversity strategy and all the questions that we have in the Parliament. A robust parliamentary system will scrutinise the use of all the powers in the bill, and, as I have said, the purposes for which the powers can be used are built into the bill. I think that they are robust.