The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3323 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
John Mason
Could the minister go into a bit more depth about where the line is on that? We all agree that we do not want universities to lose their separate status, but part of me thinks that it is a good excuse not to do anything with universities because we might be accused of interfering with them. Has the minister discussed that with the ONS or had advice? Is the minister clear about where the line is?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
John Mason
Does the member not think that that question would be better asked as part of the debate on the budget rather than in a debate on the bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
John Mason
I thank the member for giving way a second time. Again, I am sympathetic to him. That kind of thing has been tried—I think that Ben & Jerry’s tried it, if I remember correctly—and failed. The counter-argument would be that if our universities cannot attract the best people at the top, because they all go to England, America or wherever, our universities will suffer. How would you respond to that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
John Mason
That is exactly the point that I raised with Ross Greer earlier. His answer was that, in other areas through bodies such as Scottish Enterprise, we can insist on fair work, fair wages, the living wage and so on. Why is there a difference here, when we seem to be able to do it in other areas?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
John Mason
I fear that we are getting into a budget debate, but if more money is to go to the colleges, would the member like to suggest where that money should come from? I would suggest higher taxes. Would he agree with that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
John Mason
Can the member be more specific about where she thinks the problem is at the moment? Glasgow Kelvin College in my area has really taken a lead on this matter. That is one college that I have seen doing that kind of work. Does she think that some colleges and universities are not being so active?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
John Mason
An argument has been put forward by some of the universities—I am not saying that I agree with it, because I am sympathetic to what the member is trying to do—that this proposal strays into employment law. How would the member respond to that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
John Mason
That brings me to another thing that I wanted to ask you about. How satisfied do you think that victims and families are with the public inquiries that have concluded? I get the impression—perhaps especially from inquiries down south, because it is bigger and there are more of them—that, at the end of an inquiry, we get the report and see the family standing outside the court, or wherever it happens to be, saying how dissatisfied they are with it all. In some cases, people are just looking for revenge or for heads to roll, and they will not be satisfied if they get anything less.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
John Mason
That takes me on to something else. Do inquiries always shine a light? We all lived through Covid not so long ago. I was on the COVID-19 Committee in Parliament for quite some time, and we had repeated statements from the First Minister and debates in Parliament, or at least questions, very regularly. It is all very well for a judge or whoever to look back and say, “Oh—you could have done something differently,” but, at the time, we were going through a big crisis that none of us had been through before. If we had put money aside to prepare for it, there would have been less money for the NHS. There is a cost to preparing for things. Is the Covid inquiry really adding anything material that we did not know?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
John Mason
We could probably go further on that, but I will leave it for now.
Let us go back to the costs of an inquiry. It has been suggested that inquiries should be inquisitorial rather than adversarial, and I wonder whether we have got the balance right. From some of the evidence that we have had, it seems that there are lawyers absolutely everywhere. There are lawyers for the victims, lawyers for the Government, lawyers for the health board and lawyers for the police—lawyers, lawyers, lawyers. I know that there has been some kind of mitigation—for example, at least two or three groups can have the same lawyers, which saves a little bit of money. However, I wonder whether the whole thing has become just too legally driven. You have been asked at length about having judges as chairs, and, in a sense, having a judge as a chair will encourage that situation, because that is what they are used to.
11:00