The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3369 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
John Mason
That is helpful. On the Scottish figures, you said that you have been looking at the Scottish spending review and that there is a suggestion that there will have to be trade-offs between the four key priorities of the Government: poverty, climate change, economic growth and effective public services. Will you explain why there might need to be a trade-off?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
John Mason
Are they also tending to increase their taxes?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
John Mason
Good line.
Like most of the western countries, we have an ageing population. Apart from anything else, that would lead us to expect to see public expenditure to increase over time, would it not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
John Mason
There is a lot in that. Earlier, you sounded a little bit pessimistic and seemed to be saying that, on the whole, it is difficult to improve the productivity of public services. Have other countries cracked that, or is the situation much the same in the health services in Germany and America?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
John Mason
The convener has asked about a number of things already and I will touch on a few more.
You said that the 38 per cent of GDP that comprises tax is not that high in comparison to other countries. Can you give us examples from some other countries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
John Mason
Fair enough. You mentioned that prevention and early intervention are important. Do you see any change or movement in that? Is more being spent in those areas?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
John Mason
That buffer of £22 billion is not all that much, or it is probably not sufficient.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
John Mason
We often think of somewhere such as Denmark having higher taxes but more public services.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
John Mason
Debt was mentioned earlier, as was the fact that it is 96 per cent of GDP. Should that be worrying us?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
John Mason
I am sure that the committee will raise the subject in other places; I will certainly raise it in other places.
Economic growth is linked to that. I was interested in paragraph 64 of the report, which talks about timescales. It says that, if the Scottish Government does something now,
“such as supporting people into employment or investing in skills”,
that can
“take time, often many years, to feed through to the tax base and increasing tax receipts.”
It is quite difficult to make comparisons, is it not? You mentioned national outcomes and so on. An input today might take five or 10 years or more before we see its impact. Is it not hard to tie the two together? Suddenly, Ukraine has a war, for example, and that throws everything else that is going on.