The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2594 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
Okay. Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
I asked it about that. It had four extra people or something like that.
Professor Bell, is it necessary for the SFC to get into this space, given that the Scottish Government is, in a sense, under more constraint than the UK Government is?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
I will continue on that theme and play devil’s advocate. As Liz Smith has pointed out, things can happen in the very short term, whether that be changes to employer national insurance contributions, welfare or American tariffs—or all of those things. Given that, is there any point in making five-year forecasts, let alone 50-year forecasts?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
There is one final area that I want to touch on. Both the SFC and the OBR are thinking of doing more on the expenditure side in general, rather than just looking at tax forecasts and social security. I think that the OBR is further down that route. Would that be helpful? Is it a good idea?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
That is great. Thanks very much for your help.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
Has the OBR had extra resources for that? It sounds like extra work.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
John Mason
That was also helpful. Thanks.
Finally, you have said that you might be—in fact, you are—looking more at spending and going into more detail on that. That has been an issue for the SFC, too. Do you think that it should be? Does it make sense for the commission to do the same in Scotland?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
John Mason
In your report, you mention religion and belief, and specifically Islamophobia. I understand that the Young Scot “Truth About Youth” survey is due to be published today. Is that correct? You asked Young Scot to ask some questions on that subject in its survey. Will you say a bit about how concerned you are about that and where the concern has come from?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
John Mason
There will be a lot of different views among young people. Some are religious and some are not. Some follow different religions, and it can lead to practical issues; some would be more concerned than others about boys using girls’ toilets or there being mixed toilets, for example. Are you thinking about going down the route of looking at more practical aspects, or is it just at a high level?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
John Mason
Would you argue that, if the commissioner had not been in place, children’s rights would be further back and not improving as much as they have been, if at all?